--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›117700
ETF analysis

KODEX Constructions (117700) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexKRX 건설
Annual fee0.45%
Net assetsKRW 202.8B
Inception2009-10-30

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 삼성자산운용. It tracks the KRX 건설. Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 202.8B; inception 2009-10-30. Its 1-year return is +45.14%.

Index tracked
KRX 건설
Provider
삼성자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 202.8B
Inception
2009-10-30
1-month return
-22.63%
1-year return
+45.14%
Dividend yield
0.6%
Holdings
17
52-week range
3,695–10,085
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 삼성자산운용. It tracks the KRX 건설. Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 202.8B; inception 2009-10-30. Its 1-year return is +45.14%.

Index tracked
KRX 건설
Provider
삼성자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 202.8B
Inception
2009-10-30
1-month return
-22.63%
1-year return
+45.14%
Dividend yield
0.6%
Holdings
17
52-week range
3,695–10,085

16 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.01%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

16 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.01%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−152.3K sh
Foreign
+157.2K sh
Institution
−4.8K sh
Retail
2.13%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-4.24%−152.3K sh+157.2K sh−4.8K sh
10/19+2.17%+419.8K sh−394.3K sh−25.5K sh
10/16+2.22%+21.1K sh−21.4K sh+261 sh
10/15-7.08%+78.6K sh−30.0K sh−48.8K sh
10/14+0.66%−123.9K sh−401.5K sh+34.4K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−152.3K sh
Foreign
+157.2K sh
Institution
−4.8K sh
Retail
2.13%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-4.24%−152.3K sh+157.2K sh−4.8K sh
10/19+2.17%+419.8K sh−394.3K sh−25.5K sh
10/16+2.22%+21.1K sh−21.4K sh+261 sh
10/15-7.08%+78.6K sh−30.0K sh−48.8K sh
10/14+0.66%−123.9K sh−401.5K sh+34.4K sh
—
Holdings not priced
91.4%
Top-10 weight
1238
Concentration HHI (Low)
Industrials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 91.4% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1238 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Industrials (85%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,23845

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,238), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 85%0

Industrials alone is 85%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 202.8B57

Net assets of KRW 202.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,23845

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,238), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 85%0

Industrials alone is 85%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 202.8B57

Net assets of KRW 202.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 16 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 16 holdings, 100.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Samsung E&A02805020.86%
2Hyundai Engineering & Construction00072018.37%
3대우건설04704013.68%
4KEPCO Engineering & Construction0526908.86%
5GS건설0063608.56%
6DL이앤씨3755008.22%
7현대무벡스3194004.69%
8IPARK현대산업개발2948703.37%
9HDC0126302.56%
10LS마린솔루션0603702.18%
11성광벤드0146202.08%
12경동나비엔0094501.81%
13한일시멘트3007201.70%
14삼표시멘트0385001.08%
15한양이엔지0451001.08%
16아이에스동서0107800.90%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Industrials85.5%
Utilities8.9%
Materials2.8%
가정용기기와용품1.8%
Information Technology1.1%
Industry breakdown
Construction78.7%
전기유틸리티8.9%
기계6.8%
건축자재2.8%
가정용기기와용품1.8%
반도체와반도체장비1.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,238moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1238 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 91.4% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Industrials alone is 85% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 62% of its holdings with 139220 (7 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 17 positions in total; this page lists the largest 16 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.45% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

117700 comments

Leave a one-line take on KODEX 건설. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.