--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›143860
ETF analysis

TIGER HEALTH CARE (143860) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexKRX 헬스케어
Annual fee0.4%
Net assetsKRW 141.2B
Inception2011-07-18

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the KRX 헬스케어. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 141.2B; inception 2011-07-18. Its 1-year return is -14.65%.

Index tracked
KRX 헬스케어
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 141.2B
Inception
2011-07-18
1-month return
+0.99%
1-year return
-14.65%
Dividend yield
0.2%
Holdings
49
52-week range
31,360–56,000
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the KRX 헬스케어. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 141.2B; inception 2011-07-18. Its 1-year return is -14.65%.

Index tracked
KRX 헬스케어
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 141.2B
Inception
2011-07-18
1-month return
+0.99%
1-year return
-14.65%
Dividend yield
0.2%
Holdings
49
52-week range
31,360–56,000

46 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 98.18%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

46 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 98.18%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−1.5K sh
Foreign
+41 sh
Institution
+1.4K sh
Retail
0.22%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+3.36%−1.5K sh+41 sh+1.4K sh
10/16+6.47%+2.0K sh+810 sh−2.8K sh
10/15-0.94%−1.1K sh+2.2K sh−1.0K sh
10/14-0.84%+1.1K sh−2.3K sh+1.2K sh
10/13-2.43%+99 sh+59 sh−158 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−1.5K sh
Foreign
+41 sh
Institution
+1.4K sh
Retail
0.22%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+3.36%−1.5K sh+41 sh+1.4K sh
10/16+6.47%+2.0K sh+810 sh−2.8K sh
10/15-0.94%−1.1K sh+2.2K sh−1.0K sh
10/14-0.84%+1.1K sh−2.3K sh+1.2K sh
10/13-2.43%+99 sh+59 sh−158 sh
—
Holdings not priced
70.2%
Top-10 weight
1017
Concentration HHI (Low)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 70.2% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1017 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Health Care (97%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

56/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,01753

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,017), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 97%0

Health Care alone is 97%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 141.2B50

Net assets of KRW 141.2B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

56/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,01753

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,017), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 97%0

Health Care alone is 97%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 141.2B50

Net assets of KRW 141.2B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

2 derivative positions are excluded. Stock contributions do not explain the entire ETF return.

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 30 holdings, 90.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Celltrion06827024.62%
2Samsung Biologics20794013.46%
3Alteogen19617011.42%
4HLB0283004.83%
5Yuhan0001004.27%
6SK바이오팜3260302.74%
7삼천당제약0002502.69%
8Hanmi Pharm1289402.44%
9펩트론0870101.91%
10Pharma Research2144501.80%
11에이비엘바이오2983801.70%
12리가켐바이오1410801.64%
13올릭스2269501.48%
14한올바이오파마0094201.47%
15Hanmi Science0089301.29%
16디앤디파마텍3478501.29%
17엘앤씨바이오2906501.25%
18보로노이3102101.22%
19오스코텍0392001.15%
20네이처셀0073901.14%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care97.1%
생물공학1.6%
Industrials0.7%
Materials0.6%
Industry breakdown
제약64.1%
생물공학18.9%
건강관리장비와용품9.5%
생명과학도구및서비스3.9%
건강관리기술1.3%
건강관리업체및서비스1.1%
우주항공과국방0.7%
화학0.6%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,017moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1017 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 70.2% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Health Care alone is 97% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 68% of its holdings with 364970 (11 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 49 positions in total; this page lists the largest 46 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.4% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

143860 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 헬스케어. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.