--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›227560
ETF analysis

TIGER 200 생활소비재 (227560) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-16
Index코스피 200 생활소비재
Annual fee0.4%
Net assetsKRW 4.92B
Inception2015-09-23

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200 생활소비재. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 4.92B; inception 2015-09-23. Its 1-year return is +6.58%.

Index tracked
코스피 200 생활소비재
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 4.92B
Inception
2015-09-23
1-month return
-1.17%
1-year return
+6.58%
Dividend yield
2.65%
Holdings
29
52-week range
11,480–14,910
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200 생활소비재. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 4.92B; inception 2015-09-23. Its 1-year return is +6.58%.

Index tracked
코스피 200 생활소비재
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 4.92B
Inception
2015-09-23
1-month return
-1.17%
1-year return
+6.58%
Dividend yield
2.65%
Holdings
29
52-week range
11,480–14,910

28 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.66%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

28 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.66%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+121 sh
Foreign
−127 sh
Institution
+6 sh
Retail
0.29%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.02%+121 sh−127 sh+6 sh
10/16+4.08%+186 sh−662 sh+476 sh
10/15-0.25%0 sh−236 sh+236 sh
10/14+0.34%0 sh+104 sh−104 sh
10/13-3.37%−5.8K sh+6.0K sh−207 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+121 sh
Foreign
−127 sh
Institution
+6 sh
Retail
0.29%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.02%+121 sh−127 sh+6 sh
10/16+4.08%+186 sh−662 sh+476 sh
10/15-0.25%0 sh−236 sh+236 sh
10/14+0.34%0 sh+104 sh−104 sh
10/13-3.37%−5.8K sh+6.0K sh−207 sh
—
Holdings not priced
78.6%
Top-10 weight
1048
Concentration HHI (Low)
Consumer Staples
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 78.6% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1048 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Consumer Staples (42%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

62/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,04852

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,048), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Staples 42%72

Consumer Staples is 42%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 4.9B0

Net assets of KRW 4.9B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

62/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,04852

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,048), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Staples 42%72

Consumer Staples is 42%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 4.9B0

Net assets of KRW 4.9B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 28 holdings, 99.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1KT&G03378023.44%
2Korea Electric Power01576013.90%
3APR27847011.28%
4Samyang Foods0032306.77%
5Amorepacific0904306.34%
6LG H&H0519003.84%
7Orion2715603.61%
8Cosmax1928203.57%
9한국콜마1618903.24%
10CJ0010402.65%
11달바글로벌4836502.47%
12CJ CheilJedang0979502.24%
13이마트1394802.13%
14한국가스공사0364602.09%
15BGF retail2823301.87%
16농심0043701.86%
17동서0269601.30%
18GS리테일0070701.07%
19롯데지주0049900.95%
20아모레퍼시픽홀딩스0027900.94%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Consumer Staples42.1%
Consumer Discretionary36.7%
Utilities14.2%
Holding Cos3.6%
Energy2.1%
Consumer1.3%
Industry breakdown
화장품31.7%
담배23.4%
식품18.7%
전기유틸리티13.9%
백화점과일반상점5.1%
복합기업3.6%
가스유틸리티2.1%
음료1.3%
복합유틸리티0.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,048moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1048 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 78.6% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Consumer Staples(42%) · Consumer Discretionary(37%) · Utilities(14%). At 42%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 77% of its holdings with 266410 (22 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 29 positions in total; this page lists the largest 28 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.4% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

227560 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 200 생활소비재. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.