--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›241180
ETF analysis

TIGER NIKKEI225 (241180) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexNikkei 225
Annual fee0.29%
Net assetsKRW 380.8B
Inception2016-03-31

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the Nikkei 225. Key facts — expense ratio 0.29%; net assets about KRW 380.8B; inception 2016-03-31. Its 1-year return is +23.44%.

Index tracked
Nikkei 225
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.29%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 380.8B
Inception
2016-03-31
1-month return
-1.54%
1-year return
+23.44%
Dividend yield
1.04%
Holdings
227
52-week range
27,315–42,450
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the Nikkei 225. Key facts — expense ratio 0.29%; net assets about KRW 380.8B; inception 2016-03-31. Its 1-year return is +23.44%.

Index tracked
Nikkei 225
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.29%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 380.8B
Inception
2016-03-31
1-month return
-1.54%
1-year return
+23.44%
Dividend yield
1.04%
Holdings
227
52-week range
27,315–42,450

224 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.80%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

224 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.80%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−6.2K sh
Foreign
+6.0K sh
Institution
+745 sh
Retail
0.1%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-1.1%−6.2K sh+6.0K sh+745 sh
10/16+0.89%−2.7K sh+7.3K sh+3.8K sh
10/15-4.18%+3.2K sh−3.5K sh+4.8K sh
10/14-0.19%+2.5K sh+5.2K sh+6.9K sh
10/13-1.29%−2.6K sh+98.2K sh−18.0K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−6.2K sh
Foreign
+6.0K sh
Institution
+745 sh
Retail
0.1%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-1.1%−6.2K sh+6.0K sh+745 sh
10/16+0.89%−2.7K sh+7.3K sh+3.8K sh
10/15-4.18%+3.2K sh−3.5K sh+4.8K sh
10/14-0.19%+2.5K sh+5.2K sh+6.9K sh
10/13-1.29%−2.6K sh+98.2K sh−18.0K sh
—
Holdings not priced
49.0%
Top-10 weight
397
Concentration HHI (Low)
Unclassified
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 49.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 397 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Unclassified (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

70/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 39789

Concentration is below 1,500 (397), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceUnclassified 100%0

Unclassified alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.29%/yr79

0.29% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.9% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 380.8B69

Net assets of KRW 380.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

70/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 39789

Concentration is below 1,500 (397), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceUnclassified 100%0

Unclassified alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.29%/yr79

0.29% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.9% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 380.8B69

Net assets of KRW 380.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 30 holdings, 67.9% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Advantest6857.T12.42%
2Fast Retailing9983.T8.75%
3Tokyo Electron8035.T8.10%
4SoftBank9984.T6.18%
5Global X Nikkei225 ETF632A JP EQUITY3.48%
6Recruit6098.T2.64%
7TDK6762.T2.28%
8Ibiden4062.T2.02%
9KDDI9433.T1.65%
10Fujikura5803 JP EQUITY1.51%
11FANUC6954.T1.51%
12Kioxia285A.T1.49%
13Shin-Etsu Chemical4063 JP EQUITY1.49%
14Kyocera6971 JP EQUITY1.47%
15Konami9766 JP EQUITY1.15%
16Toyota Tsusho8015 JP EQUITY1.06%
17Daikin Industries6367 JP EQUITY1.03%
18Sony6758 JP EQUITY0.92%
19Chugai Pharmaceutical4519 JP EQUITY0.87%
20Lasertec6920.T0.87%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Unclassified100.0%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 397well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 397, with the top 10 holdings at just 49.0% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Unclassified alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 465660, overlaps only 25% (13 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 227 positions in total; this page lists the largest 224 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.29% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

241180 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 일본니케이225. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.