--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›281990
ETF analysis

RISE 중소형고배당 (281990) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
IndexFnGuide 중소형고배당포커스지수(시장가격지수)
Annual fee0.3%
Net assetsKRW 9B
Inception2017-11-02

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 중소형고배당포커스지수(시장가격지수). Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 9B; inception 2017-11-02. Its 1-year return is +23.78%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 중소형고배당포커스지수(시장가격지수)
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 9B
Inception
2017-11-02
1-month return
+1.62%
1-year return
+23.78%
Dividend yield
2.69%
Holdings
10
52-week range
14,460–20,970
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 중소형고배당포커스지수(시장가격지수). Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 9B; inception 2017-11-02. Its 1-year return is +23.78%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 중소형고배당포커스지수(시장가격지수)
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 9B
Inception
2017-11-02
1-month return
+1.62%
1-year return
+23.78%
Dividend yield
2.69%
Holdings
10
52-week range
14,460–20,970

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 37.60%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 37.60%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
+411 sh
Institution
−373 sh
Retail
0.28%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-0.84%0 sh+411 sh−373 sh
10/19+0.59%0 sh+507 sh−507 sh
10/16+1.45%0 sh+2.2K sh−2.2K sh
10/15-1.82%−3 sh+341 sh−338 sh
10/14+0.87%+3 sh−7 sh+4 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
+411 sh
Institution
−373 sh
Retail
0.28%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-0.84%0 sh+411 sh−373 sh
10/19+0.59%0 sh+507 sh−507 sh
10/16+1.45%0 sh+2.2K sh−2.2K sh
10/15-1.82%−3 sh+341 sh−338 sh
10/14+0.87%+3 sh−7 sh+4 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1046
Concentration HHI (Low)
Consumer Discretionary
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1046 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Consumer Discretionary (41%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

64/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,04652

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,046), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 41%73

Consumer Discretionary is 41%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 9.0B0

Net assets of KRW 9.0B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

64/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,04652

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,046), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 41%73

Consumer Discretionary is 41%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 9.0B0

Net assets of KRW 9.0B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 37.6% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Kangwon Land03525014.66%
2S-1 Corporation01275012.39%
3Cheil Worldwide03000011.17%
4동서02696010.88%
5한국앤컴퍼니0002409.52%
6미스토홀딩스0816608.99%
7한국가스공사0364608.64%
8SL Corp.0058508.06%
9팬오션0286707.98%
10KCC0023807.71%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Consumer Discretionary41.2%
Industrials20.4%
Communication Services11.2%
Consumer Staples10.9%
Energy8.6%
Materials7.7%
Industry breakdown
자동차부품17.6%
호텔,레스토랑,레저14.7%
상업서비스와공급품12.4%
광고11.2%
식품10.9%
섬유,의류,신발,호화품9.0%
가스유틸리티8.6%
해운사8.0%
건축자재7.7%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,046moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1046 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Consumer Discretionary(41%) · Industrials(20%) · Communication Services(11%). At 41%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 279530, overlaps only 20% (5 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

Equities are 37.6% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.3% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

281990 comments

Leave a one-line take on RISE 중소형고배당. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.