--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›364990
ETF analysis

TIGER 게임TOP10 (364990) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-19
IndexKRX 게임 TOP 10 지수
Annual fee0.4%
Net assetsKRW 20.4B
Inception2020-10-07

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the KRX 게임 TOP 10 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 20.4B; inception 2020-10-07. Its 1-year return is -14.86%.

Index tracked
KRX 게임 TOP 10 지수
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 20.4B
Inception
2020-10-07
1-month return
+0.34%
1-year return
-14.86%
Dividend yield
1.01%
Holdings
11
52-week range
4,185–6,210
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the KRX 게임 TOP 10 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 20.4B; inception 2020-10-07. Its 1-year return is -14.86%.

Index tracked
KRX 게임 TOP 10 지수
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 20.4B
Inception
2020-10-07
1-month return
+0.34%
1-year return
-14.86%
Dividend yield
1.01%
Holdings
11
52-week range
4,185–6,210

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.71%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.71%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+22.0K sh
Foreign
+1.2K sh
Institution
−23.2K sh
Retail
1.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+2.41%+22.0K sh+1.2K sh−23.2K sh
10/16+1.99%−1.9K sh−11.0K sh+12.9K sh
10/15-0.81%+3.7K sh+24.7K sh−28.5K sh
10/14+0.23%+4.2K sh−8.1K sh+3.9K sh
10/13-0.81%−3.2K sh+8.0K sh−4.8K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+22.0K sh
Foreign
+1.2K sh
Institution
−23.2K sh
Retail
1.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+2.41%+22.0K sh+1.2K sh−23.2K sh
10/16+1.99%−1.9K sh−11.0K sh+12.9K sh
10/15-0.81%+3.7K sh+24.7K sh−28.5K sh
10/14+0.23%+4.2K sh−8.1K sh+3.9K sh
10/13-0.81%−3.2K sh+8.0K sh−4.8K sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
2017
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Communication Services
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 2017 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Communication Services (96%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

44/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 2,01726

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (2,017) — moderate.

Sector balanceCommunication Services 96%0

Communication Services alone is 96%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 20.4B13

Net assets of KRW 20.4B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

44/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 2,01726

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (2,017) — moderate.

Sector balanceCommunication Services 96%0

Communication Services alone is 96%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 20.4B13

Net assets of KRW 20.4B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 99.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1NCSOFT03657025.79%
2Netmarble25127025.64%
3Krafton25996024.09%
4펄어비스2637507.91%
5NHN1817104.13%
6더블유게임즈1920803.69%
7카카오게임즈2934903.01%
8시프트업4628702.59%
9위메이드1120401.75%
10넥슨게임즈2255701.40%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Communication Services95.9%
Information Technology4.1%
Industry breakdown
게임엔터테인먼트95.9%
IT서비스4.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 2,017concentrated
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

TIGER 게임TOP10 leans heavily on a handful of names. Its concentration index (HHI) is 2017, and the top 10 holdings make up 100.0% of equity weight — closer to owning a few stocks than a diversified basket.

If you bought it for diversification, note that when one or two of those names move sharply, most of the fund's day comes from them.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Communication Services alone is 96% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 77% of its holdings with 395280 (8 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 11 positions in total; this page lists the largest 10 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.4% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

364990 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 게임TOP10. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.