--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›407300
ETF analysis

HANARO Fn골프테마 (407300) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
IndexFnGuide 골프 테마 지수(시장가격)
Annual fee0.45%
Net assetsKRW 5.01B
Inception2021-11-24

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from NH아문디자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 골프 테마 지수(시장가격). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 5.01B; inception 2021-11-24. Its 1-year return is +5.24%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 골프 테마 지수(시장가격)
Provider
NH아문디자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 5.01B
Inception
2021-11-24
1-month return
-13.03%
1-year return
+5.24%
Dividend yield
1.71%
Holdings
10
52-week range
8,330–14,255
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from NH아문디자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 골프 테마 지수(시장가격). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 5.01B; inception 2021-11-24. Its 1-year return is +5.24%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 골프 테마 지수(시장가격)
Provider
NH아문디자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 5.01B
Inception
2021-11-24
1-month return
-13.03%
1-year return
+5.24%
Dividend yield
1.71%
Holdings
10
52-week range
8,330–14,255

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 85.26%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 85.26%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
−1 sh
Institution
+1 sh
Retail
0%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-3.42%0 sh−1 sh+1 sh
10/19+1.35%0 sh+40 sh−40 sh
10/16+2.9%0 sh+5 sh−5 sh
10/15-5.47%0 sh−5 sh+5 sh
10/14-1.4%0 sh+36 sh−36 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
−1 sh
Institution
+1 sh
Retail
0%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-3.42%0 sh−1 sh+1 sh
10/19+1.35%0 sh+40 sh−40 sh
10/16+2.9%0 sh+5 sh−5 sh
10/15-5.47%0 sh−5 sh+5 sh
10/14-1.4%0 sh+36 sh−36 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1021
Concentration HHI (Low)
Consumer Discretionary
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1021 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Consumer Discretionary (29%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,02153

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,021), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 29%93

The largest sector is Consumer Discretionary at 29% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 5.0B0

Net assets of KRW 5.0B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,02153

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,021), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 29%93

The largest sector is Consumer Discretionary at 29% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 5.0B0

Net assets of KRW 5.0B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 85.3% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Kakao03572012.15%
2신세계00417011.68%
3한화00088010.75%
4Samsung C&T02826010.44%
5Doosan Enerbility03402010.39%
6DB HiTek00099010.29%
7Kangwon Land0352509.95%
8Kumho Petrochemical0117809.19%
9카카오페이3773007.65%
10미스토홀딩스0816607.51%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Consumer Discretionary29.1%
Industrials20.8%
Information Technology17.9%
Communication Services12.2%
Holding Cos10.8%
Materials9.2%
Industry breakdown
복합기업21.2%
양방향미디어와서비스12.2%
백화점과일반상점11.7%
기계10.4%
반도체와반도체장비10.3%
호텔,레스토랑,레저9.9%
화학9.2%
IT서비스7.7%
섬유,의류,신발,호화품7.5%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,021moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1021 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Consumer Discretionary(29%) · Industrials(21%) · Information Technology(18%), and even the largest is only 29% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 226980, overlaps only 8% (5 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

Equities are 85.3% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.45% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

407300 comments

Leave a one-line take on HANARO Fn골프테마. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.