--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›442260
ETF analysis

Mighty Dynamic Quant Active (442260) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
Index코스피 200
Annual fee0.295%
Net assetsKRW 38.7B
Inception2022-10-25

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from DB자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200. Key facts — expense ratio 0.295%; net assets about KRW 38.7B; inception 2022-10-25. Its 1-year return is +72.44%.

Index tracked
코스피 200
Provider
DB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.295%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 38.7B
Inception
2022-10-25
1-month return
-18.37%
1-year return
+72.44%
Dividend yield
1.12%
Holdings
10
52-week range
18,465–53,515
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from DB자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200. Key facts — expense ratio 0.295%; net assets about KRW 38.7B; inception 2022-10-25. Its 1-year return is +72.44%.

Index tracked
코스피 200
Provider
DB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.295%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 38.7B
Inception
2022-10-25
1-month return
-18.37%
1-year return
+72.44%
Dividend yield
1.12%
Holdings
10
52-week range
18,465–53,515

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 82.04%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 82.04%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−69 sh
Foreign
+205 sh
Institution
−136 sh
Retail
0.05%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-3.67%−69 sh+205 sh−136 sh
10/19+1.92%−8 sh+377 sh−369 sh
10/16+1.37%+80 sh−475 sh+395 sh
10/15-8.48%−8 sh0 sh+8 sh
10/14-0.41%−72 sh+58 sh+14 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−69 sh
Foreign
+205 sh
Institution
−136 sh
Retail
0.05%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-3.67%−69 sh+205 sh−136 sh
10/19+1.92%−8 sh+377 sh−369 sh
10/16+1.37%+80 sh−475 sh+395 sh
10/15-8.48%−8 sh0 sh+8 sh
10/14-0.41%−72 sh+58 sh+14 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
2382
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 2382 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Information Technology (69%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

51/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 2,38220

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (2,382) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 69%27

Information Technology alone is 69%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.295%/yr79

0.295% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.9% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 38.7B26

Net assets of KRW 38.7B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

51/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 2,38220

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (2,382) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 69%27

Information Technology alone is 69%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.295%/yr79

0.295% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.9% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 38.7B26

Net assets of KRW 38.7B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 82.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Samsung Electronics00593032.01%
2SK hynix00066029.25%
3마이티 200TR0112X020.94%
4SK Square4023406.31%
5SK Inc.0347302.45%
6Hyundai Motor0053802.43%
7Kia0002702.10%
8KB Financial Group1055601.62%
9Samsung Electro-Mechanics0091501.50%
10S-Oil0109501.39%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology69.1%
Unclassified20.9%
Consumer Discretionary4.5%
Energy3.8%
Financials1.6%
Industry breakdown
반도체와반도체장비67.6%
Unclassified20.9%
Automobiles4.5%
석유와가스3.8%
은행1.6%
전자장비와기기1.5%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 2,382concentrated
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

마이티 다이나믹퀀트액티브 leans heavily on a handful of names. Its concentration index (HHI) is 2382, and the top 10 holdings make up 100.0% of equity weight — closer to owning a few stocks than a diversified basket.

If you bought it for diversification, note that when one or two of those names move sharply, most of the fund's day comes from them.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 69% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 74% of its holdings with 413930 (7 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

Equities are 82.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.295% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

442260 comments

Leave a one-line take on 마이티 다이나믹퀀트액티브. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.