--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›466940
ETF analysis

TIGER 은행고배당플러스TOP10 (466940) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexFnGuide 은행고배당플러스TOP10 지수(시장가격 지수)
Annual fee0.3%
Net assetsKRW 836B
Inception2023-10-17

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 은행고배당플러스TOP10 지수(시장가격 지수). Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 836B; inception 2023-10-17. Its 1-year return is +27.58%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 은행고배당플러스TOP10 지수(시장가격 지수)
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 836B
Inception
2023-10-17
1-month return
-11%
1-year return
+27.58%
Dividend yield
4.23%
Holdings
11
52-week range
19,510–30,210
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 은행고배당플러스TOP10 지수(시장가격 지수). Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 836B; inception 2023-10-17. Its 1-year return is +27.58%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 은행고배당플러스TOP10 지수(시장가격 지수)
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 836B
Inception
2023-10-17
1-month return
-11%
1-year return
+27.58%
Dividend yield
4.23%
Holdings
11
52-week range
19,510–30,210

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−39.6K sh
Foreign
−27.4K sh
Institution
+61.0K sh
Retail
0.6%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.34%−39.6K sh−27.4K sh+61.0K sh
10/16+1.55%−4.5K sh−39.1K sh+43.6K sh
10/15-1.48%+19.9K sh+74.1K sh−94.2K sh
10/14-2.12%−15.4K sh−79.6K sh+98.3K sh
10/13-0.6%+34.5K sh−39.2K sh+4.6K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−39.6K sh
Foreign
−27.4K sh
Institution
+61.0K sh
Retail
0.6%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.34%−39.6K sh−27.4K sh+61.0K sh
10/16+1.55%−4.5K sh−39.1K sh+43.6K sh
10/15-1.48%+19.9K sh+74.1K sh−94.2K sh
10/14-2.12%−15.4K sh−79.6K sh+98.3K sh
10/13-0.6%+34.5K sh−39.2K sh+4.6K sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1322
Concentration HHI (Low)
Financials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1322 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Financials (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

61/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,32243

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,322), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 836.0B84

Net assets of KRW 836.0B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

61/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,32243

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,322), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 836.0B84

Net assets of KRW 836.0B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 99.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Hana Financial Group08679016.46%
2KB Financial Group10556015.96%
3Woori Financial Group31614015.94%
4Shinhan Financial Group05555015.01%
5Industrial Bank of Korea02411014.54%
6JB Financial Group1753306.09%
7BNK Financial Group1389305.40%
8Samsung Fire & Marine Insurance0008104.49%
9Korea Investment Holdings0710503.24%
10iM Financial Group1391302.87%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Financials100.0%
Industry breakdown
은행92.3%
손해보험4.5%
Securities3.2%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,322moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1322 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Financials alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 78% of its holdings with 091220 (9 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 11 positions in total; this page lists the largest 10 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.3% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

466940 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 은행고배당플러스TOP10. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.