--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›472720
ETF analysis

TRUSTON 주주가치액티브 (472720) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
Index코스피 200
Annual fee0.785%
Net assetsKRW 11.6B
Inception2023-12-14

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 트러스톤자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200. Key facts — expense ratio 0.785%; net assets about KRW 11.6B; inception 2023-12-14. Its 1-year return is +36.84%.

Index tracked
코스피 200
Provider
트러스톤자산운용
Expense ratio
0.785%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 11.6B
Inception
2023-12-14
1-month return
-13.4%
1-year return
+36.84%
Dividend yield
1.7%
Holdings
10
52-week range
17,010–32,325
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 트러스톤자산운용. It tracks the 코스피 200. Key facts — expense ratio 0.785%; net assets about KRW 11.6B; inception 2023-12-14. Its 1-year return is +36.84%.

Index tracked
코스피 200
Provider
트러스톤자산운용
Expense ratio
0.785%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 11.6B
Inception
2023-12-14
1-month return
-13.4%
1-year return
+36.84%
Dividend yield
1.7%
Holdings
10
52-week range
17,010–32,325

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 54.94%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 54.94%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
−169 sh
Institution
+168 sh
Retail
0.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.71%0 sh−169 sh+168 sh
10/16+2.45%0 sh−45 sh+44 sh
10/15-6.14%0 sh+662 sh−663 sh
10/14-0.65%0 sh+100 sh−101 sh
10/13-3.82%+1 sh−22 sh+20 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

0 sh
Foreign
−169 sh
Institution
+168 sh
Retail
0.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.71%0 sh−169 sh+168 sh
10/16+2.45%0 sh−45 sh+44 sh
10/15-6.14%0 sh+662 sh−663 sh
10/14-0.65%0 sh+100 sh−101 sh
10/13-3.82%+1 sh−22 sh+20 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1606
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1606 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Information Technology (45%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

51/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,60635

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,606) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 45%67

Information Technology is 45%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.785%/yr36

0.785% a year is on the high side — about 7.9% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund sizeKRW 11.6B3

Net assets of KRW 11.6B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

51/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,60635

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,606) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 45%67

Information Technology is 45%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.785%/yr36

0.785% a year is on the high side — about 7.9% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund sizeKRW 11.6B3

Net assets of KRW 11.6B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 54.9% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1SK hynix00066032.49%
2Samsung Electronics00593012.10%
3KB Financial Group1055608.92%
4Doosan0001508.61%
5NH Investment & Securities0059408.45%
6LS Corp.0062607.86%
7Kiwoom Securities0394905.99%
8Shinhan Financial Group0555505.66%
9SK Inc.0347304.97%
10현대차2우B0053874.95%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology44.6%
Financials29.0%
Holding Cos8.6%
Industrials7.9%
Energy5.0%
Consumer Discretionary5.0%
Industry breakdown
반도체와반도체장비44.6%
은행14.6%
Securities14.4%
복합기업8.6%
전기장비7.9%
석유와가스5.0%
Automobiles5.0%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,606moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1606 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Information Technology(45%) · Financials(29%) · Holding Cos(9%). At 45%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 289250, overlaps only 34% (8 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

Equities are 54.9% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.785% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

472720 comments

Leave a one-line take on TRUSTON 주주가치액티브. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.