--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›476070
ETF analysis

KODEX 글로벌비만치료제TOP2 Plus (476070) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-15
IndexiSelect 글로벌 비만치료제TOP2 Plus 지수(PR)
Annual fee0.45%
Net assetsKRW 25.8B
Inception2024-02-14

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 삼성자산운용. It tracks the iSelect 글로벌 비만치료제TOP2 Plus 지수(PR). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 25.8B; inception 2024-02-14. Its 1-year return is +2.97%.

Index tracked
iSelect 글로벌 비만치료제TOP2 Plus 지수(PR)
Provider
삼성자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 25.8B
Inception
2024-02-14
1-month return
-5.51%
1-year return
+2.97%
Dividend yield
1.67%
Holdings
12
52-week range
9,745–12,785
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 삼성자산운용. It tracks the iSelect 글로벌 비만치료제TOP2 Plus 지수(PR). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 25.8B; inception 2024-02-14. Its 1-year return is +2.97%.

Index tracked
iSelect 글로벌 비만치료제TOP2 Plus 지수(PR)
Provider
삼성자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 25.8B
Inception
2024-02-14
1-month return
-5.51%
1-year return
+2.97%
Dividend yield
1.67%
Holdings
12
52-week range
9,745–12,785

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.01%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.01%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+112 sh
Foreign
−1.3K sh
Institution
+1.2K sh
Retail
0.24%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-1.46%+112 sh−1.3K sh+1.2K sh
10/16+1.53%+261 sh−968 sh+711 sh
10/15+3.32%−376 sh−730 sh+1.0K sh
10/14-2.25%+3 sh+1.4K sh−1.4K sh
10/13+1.16%+379 sh+4.7K sh−5.1K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+112 sh
Foreign
−1.3K sh
Institution
+1.2K sh
Retail
0.24%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-1.46%+112 sh−1.3K sh+1.2K sh
10/16+1.53%+261 sh−968 sh+711 sh
10/15+3.32%−376 sh−730 sh+1.0K sh
10/14-2.25%+3 sh+1.4K sh−1.4K sh
10/13+1.16%+379 sh+4.7K sh−5.1K sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1604
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1604 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Health Care (88%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

46/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,60435

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,604) — moderate.

Sector balanceHealth Care 88%0

Health Care alone is 88%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 25.8B18

Net assets of KRW 25.8B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

46/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,60435

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,604) — moderate.

Sector balanceHealth Care 88%0

Health Care alone is 88%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 25.8B18

Net assets of KRW 25.8B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 100.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1ELI LILLYLLY28.15%
2Novo Nordisk A/SNVO22.43%
3PFIZERPFE6.89%
4ROCHEROP SW EQUITY6.86%
5ASTRAZENECA-SPAZN6.62%
6AMGENAMGN6.50%
7REGENERON PHARMREGN6.25%
8Rhythm PharmaceuticalsRYTM5.78%
9Viking TherapeuticsVKTX5.49%
10Zealand Pharma A/SZEAL DC EQUITY5.03%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care88.1%
Unclassified11.9%
Industry breakdown
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations81.6%
Unclassified11.9%
Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)6.5%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,604moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1604 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Health Care alone is 88% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 48% of its holdings with 453640 (6 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 12 positions in total; this page lists the largest 10 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.45% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

476070 comments

Leave a one-line take on KODEX 글로벌비만치료제TOP2 Plus. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.