--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›494840
ETF analysis

TIGER US DEFENSE TOP 10 (494840) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-19
IndexMirae Asset US Defense Top 10 Index(PR)
Annual fee0.45%
Net assetsKRW 39.9B
Inception2024-10-29

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the Mirae Asset US Defense Top 10 Index(PR). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 39.9B; inception 2024-10-29. Its 1-year return is -0.95%.

Index tracked
Mirae Asset US Defense Top 10 Index(PR)
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 39.9B
Inception
2024-10-29
1-month return
-4.72%
1-year return
-0.95%
Dividend yield
1.35%
Holdings
11
52-week range
11,000–16,720
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the Mirae Asset US Defense Top 10 Index(PR). Key facts — expense ratio 0.45%; net assets about KRW 39.9B; inception 2024-10-29. Its 1-year return is -0.95%.

Index tracked
Mirae Asset US Defense Top 10 Index(PR)
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.45%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 39.9B
Inception
2024-10-29
1-month return
-4.72%
1-year return
-0.95%
Dividend yield
1.35%
Holdings
11
52-week range
11,000–16,720

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.52%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 99.52%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−2.9K sh
Foreign
−17.0K sh
Institution
+33.4K sh
Retail
4.42%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-1.11%−2.9K sh−17.0K sh+33.4K sh
10/19+2.49%+1.0K sh+994 sh−2.5K sh
10/16+0.22%−5.5K sh+968 sh+4.6K sh
10/15+2.7%−4.7K sh+6.7K sh−5.3K sh
10/14-2.2%−677 sh−204 sh+586 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−2.9K sh
Foreign
−17.0K sh
Institution
+33.4K sh
Retail
4.42%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-1.11%−2.9K sh−17.0K sh+33.4K sh
10/19+2.49%+1.0K sh+994 sh−2.5K sh
10/16+0.22%−5.5K sh+968 sh+4.6K sh
10/15+2.7%−4.7K sh+6.7K sh−5.3K sh
10/14-2.2%−677 sh−204 sh+586 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1628
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Industrials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1628 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Industrials (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

47/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,62835

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,628) — moderate.

Sector balanceIndustrials 100%0

Industrials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 39.9B26

Net assets of KRW 39.9B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

47/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,62835

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,628) — moderate.

Sector balanceIndustrials 100%0

Industrials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.45%/yr65

0.45% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.5% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 39.9B26

Net assets of KRW 39.9B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 99.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1RTXRTX22.14%
2Lockheed MartinLMT21.26%
3General DynamicsGD17.99%
4Northrop GrummanNOC13.64%
5Boeing/TheBA10.57%
6L3Harris TechnologiesLHX5.80%
7Huntington Ingalls IndustriesHII4.55%
8Elbit SystemsESLT3.17%
9AeroVironmentAVAV0.54%
10Mercury SystemsMRCY0.34%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Industrials99.7%
Information Technology0.3%
Industry breakdown
Aerospace33.3%
Military/Government/Technical24.4%
Marine Transportation22.5%
Industrial Machinery/Components19.4%
Electrical Products0.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,628moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1628 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Industrials alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 309230, overlaps only 5% (3 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 11 positions in total; this page lists the largest 10 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.45% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

494840 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 미국방산TOP10. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.