--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›495050
ETF analysis

RISE Korea Value-Up (495050) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
Index코리아 밸류업 지수
Annual fee0.008%
Net assetsKRW 733.8B
Inception2024-11-04

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the 코리아 밸류업 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.008%; net assets about KRW 733.8B; inception 2024-11-04. Its 1-year return is +79.91%.

Index tracked
코리아 밸류업 지수
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.008%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 733.8B
Inception
2024-11-04
1-month return
-15.04%
1-year return
+79.91%
Dividend yield
1.41%
Holdings
10
52-week range
15,055–43,140
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the 코리아 밸류업 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.008%; net assets about KRW 733.8B; inception 2024-11-04. Its 1-year return is +79.91%.

Index tracked
코리아 밸류업 지수
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.008%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 733.8B
Inception
2024-11-04
1-month return
-15.04%
1-year return
+79.91%
Dividend yield
1.41%
Holdings
10
52-week range
15,055–43,140

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 65.46%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 65.46%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+2.8K sh
Foreign
−786 sh
Institution
−2.1K sh
Retail
0.46%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.01%+2.8K sh−786 sh−2.1K sh
10/16+2.25%−25.5K sh+20.6K sh+3.8K sh
10/15-5.98%−19.6K sh+10.9K sh+8.7K sh
10/14-1.35%+111.8K sh−112.8K sh+1.1K sh
10/13-5.18%+5.0K sh−18.0K sh+13.0K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+2.8K sh
Foreign
−786 sh
Institution
−2.1K sh
Retail
0.46%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+1.01%+2.8K sh−786 sh−2.1K sh
10/16+2.25%−25.5K sh+20.6K sh+3.8K sh
10/15-5.98%−19.6K sh+10.9K sh+8.7K sh
10/14-1.35%+111.8K sh−112.8K sh+1.1K sh
10/13-5.18%+5.0K sh−18.0K sh+13.0K sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1688
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1688 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Information Technology (63%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

69/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,68833

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,688) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 63%37

Information Technology alone is 63%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.008%/yr100

At 0.008% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund sizeKRW 733.8B81

Net assets of KRW 733.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

69/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,68833

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,688) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 63%37

Information Technology alone is 63%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.008%/yr100

At 0.008% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund sizeKRW 733.8B81

Net assets of KRW 733.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 65.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1SK hynix00066026.78%
2Samsung Electronics00593025.39%
3SK Square40234010.91%
4KB Financial Group1055607.55%
5Hyundai Motor0053806.72%
6Shinhan Financial Group0555505.79%
7Hana Financial Group0867904.63%
8Hanwha Aerospace0124504.49%
9Kia0002704.32%
10Hyundai Mobis0123303.42%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology63.1%
Financials18.0%
Consumer Discretionary14.5%
Industrials4.5%
Industry breakdown
반도체와반도체장비63.1%
은행18.0%
Automobiles11.0%
우주항공과국방4.5%
자동차부품3.4%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,688moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1688 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 63% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Its closest neighbour is 495750 at 92% overlap — effectively the same basket.

Holding both is not diversification, it is buying the same companies twice. Pick whichever is cheaper.

What it is made of

Equities are 65.5% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.008% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

495050 comments

Leave a one-line take on RISE 코리아밸류업. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.