--:-- ET
ETF analysis

JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF (BBMC) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexMorningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended
Annual fee0.07%
Net assets$2.1B
InceptionApr 14, 2020

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from JPMorgan Chase. It tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended. Key facts — expense ratio 0.07%; net assets about $2.1B; inception Apr 14, 2020. Its 1-year return is +18.9%.

Index tracked
Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended
Provider
JPMorgan Chase
Expense ratio
0.07%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.1B
Inception
Apr 14, 2020
1-year return
+18.9%
Holdings
463
52-week range
$99.77–$130.07
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from JPMorgan Chase. It tracks the Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended. Key facts — expense ratio 0.07%; net assets about $2.1B; inception Apr 14, 2020. Its 1-year return is +18.9%.

Index tracked
Morningstar US Mid Cap Target Market Exposure Extended
Provider
JPMorgan Chase
Expense ratio
0.07%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.1B
Inception
Apr 14, 2020
1-year return
+18.9%
Holdings
463
52-week range
$99.77–$130.07

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 15.33%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 15.33%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
53.1%
Top-10 weight
482
Concentration HHI (Low)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 53.1% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 482 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Health Care (36%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

86/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 48282

Concentration is below 1,500 (482), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 36%81

The largest sector is Health Care at 36% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.07%/yr98

At 0.07% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$2.1B62

Net assets of $2.1B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

86/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 48282

Concentration is below 1,500 (482), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 36%81

The largest sector is Health Care at 36% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.07%/yr98

At 0.07% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$2.1B62

Net assets of $2.1B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 15.3% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1ModernaMRNA11.22%
2NateraNTRA7.83%
3Revolution MedicinesRVMD5.22%
4AtlassianTEAM4.76%
5OktaOKTA4.57%
6Williams-SonomaWSM4.24%
7JPMorgan US Government MMkt IMMGMXX4.17%
8TechnipFMCFTI3.78%
9Casey's General StoresCASY3.72%
10ATIATI3.59%
11TapestryTPR3.52%
12Qnity ElectronicsQ3.52%
13nVent ElectricNVT3.33%
14RedditRDDT3.26%
15US FoodsUSFD3.26%
16XPOXPO3.20%
17Tenet HealthcareTHC3.07%
18RelianceRS3.07%
19ViatrisVTRS3.07%
20AffirmAFRM3.07%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care36.3%
Consumer Discretionary18.0%
Industrials12.9%
Information Technology12.8%
Communication Services6.2%
Unclassified4.2%
Consumer Staples3.7%
Financials3.1%
Industry breakdown
Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)16.4%
Medical Specialities10.8%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software9.3%
Industrial Machinery/Components6.1%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations6.0%
Home Furnishings4.2%
Unclassified4.2%
Oil and Gas Field Machinery3.8%
Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations3.7%
Steel/Iron Ore3.6%
Apparel3.5%
Semiconductors3.5%
EDP Services3.3%
Food Distributors3.3%
Transportation Services3.2%
Hospital/Nursing Management3.1%
Metal Fabrications3.1%
Finance: Consumer Services3.1%
Cable & Other Pay Television Services2.9%
Precious Metals2.9%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 482well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 482, with the top 10 holdings at just 53.1% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Health Care(36%) · Consumer Discretionary(18%) · Industrials(13%). At 36%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, PTMC, overlaps only 39% (12 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 463 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 15.3% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.07% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

BBMC comments

Leave a one-line take on JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Mid Cap Equity ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.