--:-- ET
ETF analysis

BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF (BKSE) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexSolactive GBS United States 600 Index
Annual fee0.04%
Net assets$84M
InceptionApr 9, 2020

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BNY Mellon. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 600 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.04%; net assets about $84M; inception Apr 9, 2020. Its 1-year return is +16.28%.

Index tracked
Solactive GBS United States 600 Index
Provider
BNY Mellon
Expense ratio
0.04%
Net assets (AUM)
$84M
Inception
Apr 9, 2020
1-year return
+16.28%
Holdings
605
52-week range
$34.999–$46.023
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BNY Mellon. It tracks the Solactive GBS United States 600 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.04%; net assets about $84M; inception Apr 9, 2020. Its 1-year return is +16.28%.

Index tracked
Solactive GBS United States 600 Index
Provider
BNY Mellon
Expense ratio
0.04%
Net assets (AUM)
$84M
Inception
Apr 9, 2020
1-year return
+16.28%
Holdings
605
52-week range
$34.999–$46.023

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 8.98%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 8.98%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
44.5%
Top-10 weight
406
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 44.5% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 406 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (28%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

82/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 40688

Concentration is below 1,500 (406), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 28%95

The largest sector is Information Technology at 28% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.04%/yr100

At 0.04% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$84M9

Net assets of $84M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

82/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 40688

Concentration is below 1,500 (406), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 28%95

The largest sector is Information Technology at 28% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.04%/yr100

At 0.04% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$84M9

Net assets of $84M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 9.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1AvantorAVTR5.46%
2Twist BioscienceTWST4.68%
3GitLabGTLB4.68%
4Brinker InternationalEAT4.45%
5SM EnergySM4.34%
6PBF EnergyPBF4.34%
710x GenomicsTXG4.23%
8ElasticESTC4.23%
9AvnetAVT4.12%
10The Hanover InsuranceTHG4.01%
11EtsyETSY4.01%
12RalliantRAL4.01%
13Ryman Hospitality PropertiesRHP3.90%
14SentinelOneS3.79%
15Lamb WestonLW3.79%
16Silicon LaboratoriesSLAB3.79%
17Zeta GlobalZETA3.79%
18ArcosaACA3.68%
19Cleveland-CliffsCLF3.56%
20PaylocityPCTY3.56%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology27.9%
Industrials16.6%
Consumer Discretionary15.6%
Health Care12.5%
Energy8.7%
Financials7.5%
Real Estate3.9%
Consumer Staples3.8%
Industry breakdown
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software20.0%
Biotechnology: Laboratory Analytical Instruments9.7%
Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)4.7%
Restaurants4.5%
Oil & Gas Production4.3%
Integrated oil Companies4.3%
Electronic Components4.1%
Property-Casualty Insurers4.0%
Business Services4.0%
Industrial Machinery/Components4.0%
Real Estate Investment Trusts3.9%
Packaged Foods3.8%
Semiconductors3.8%
Metal Fabrications3.7%
Metal Mining3.6%
Marine Transportation3.6%
Oil and Gas Field Machinery3.6%
Medical/Nursing Services3.6%
Real Estate3.5%
Auto Manufacturing3.5%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 406well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 406, with the top 10 holdings at just 44.5% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Information Technology(28%) · Industrials(17%) · Consumer Discretionary(16%), and even the largest is only 28% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, BBSC, overlaps only 39% (11 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 605 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 9.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.04% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

BKSE comments

Leave a one-line take on BNY Mellon US Small Cap Core Equity ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.