--:-- ET
ETF analysis

MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks -3 Inverse Leveraged ETNs due February 17 2045 (BNKD) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

Leverage/Inverse -2xUS-listed

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 100.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1000
Concentration HHI (Low)
Financials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1000 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Financials (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

32/ 100
DHigh-risk structure
DiversificationHHI 1,00054

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,000), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Structural simplicityInverse 2x35

A 2x inverse fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 2". Built for short holds.

We don't have cost, fund size for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks -3 Inverse Leveraged ETNs due February 17 2045 yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

32/ 100
DHigh-risk structure
DiversificationHHI 1,00054

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,000), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Structural simplicityInverse 2x35

A 2x inverse fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 2". Built for short holds.

We don't have cost, fund size for MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks -3 Inverse Leveraged ETNs due February 17 2045 yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 100.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1CitigroupC10.37%
2Wells FargoWFC10.23%
3U.S. BancorpUSB10.11%
4JPMorgan ChaseJPM10.09%
5The Goldman SachsGS10.02%
6Bank of AmericaBAC9.92%
7The PNC Financial ServicesPNC9.91%
8Morgan StanleyMS9.89%
9The Bank of New York MellonBNY9.78%
10The Charles SchwabSCHW9.68%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Financials100.0%
Industry breakdown
Major Banks70.4%
Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service29.6%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,000moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

Leverage / inverse caveat

This fund tracks 2x the inverse of its index — it rises when the index falls, and vice versa.

That 2x applies to a **single day**. Held longer, the daily reset makes the period return drift from 2x the index: if the index chops up and down and returns to where it started, this fund is still down. That is volatility decay.

It bites hardest in sideways markets and compounds with holding time. These are built for short directional trades.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1000 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Financials alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Its closest neighbour is BNKU at 100% overlap — effectively the same basket.

Holding both is not diversification, it is buying the same companies twice. Pick whichever is cheaper.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

BNKD comments

Leave a one-line take on MicroSectors U.S. Big Banks -3 Inverse Leveraged ETNs due February 17 2045. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.