--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (BSJT) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexICE BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index
Annual fee0.42%
Net assets$599M
InceptionSep 15, 2021

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the ICE BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.42%; net assets about $599M; inception Sep 15, 2021. Its 1-year return is +2.58%.

Index tracked
ICE BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.42%
Net assets (AUM)
$599M
Inception
Sep 15, 2021
1-year return
+2.58%
Holdings
311
52-week range
$20.54–$21.67
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the ICE BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.42%; net assets about $599M; inception Sep 15, 2021. Its 1-year return is +2.58%.

Index tracked
ICE BulletShares High Yield Corporate Bond 2029 Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.42%
Net assets (AUM)
$599M
Inception
Sep 15, 2021
1-year return
+2.58%
Holdings
311
52-week range
$20.54–$21.67

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

BSJT comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco BulletShares 2029 High Yield Corporate Bond ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.