--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Equity and Inclusion Index ETF (CDEI) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-13
IndexCalvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index
Annual fee0.14%
Net assets$19M
InceptionJan 30, 2023

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Morgan Stanley. It tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.14%; net assets about $19M; inception Jan 30, 2023. Its 1-year return is +20.29%.

Index tracked
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index
Provider
Morgan Stanley
Expense ratio
0.14%
Net assets (AUM)
$19M
Inception
Jan 30, 2023
1-year return
+20.29%
Holdings
232
52-week range
$75.452–$95.91
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Morgan Stanley. It tracks the Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.14%; net assets about $19M; inception Jan 30, 2023. Its 1-year return is +20.29%.

Index tracked
Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Research Index
Provider
Morgan Stanley
Expense ratio
0.14%
Net assets (AUM)
$19M
Inception
Jan 30, 2023
1-year return
+20.29%
Holdings
232
52-week range
$75.452–$95.91

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 69.04%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 69.04%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
72.8%
Top-10 weight
749
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 72.8% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 749 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (56%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 74965

Concentration is below 1,500 (749), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 56%48

Information Technology is 56%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.14%/yr92

At 0.14% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$19M0

Net assets of $19M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 74965

Concentration is below 1,500 (749), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 56%48

Information Technology is 56%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.14%/yr92

At 0.14% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$19M0

Net assets of $19M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 69.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1NVIDIANVDA13.57%
2AppleAAPL13.05%
3MicrosoftMSFT11.02%
4AlphabetGOOGL10.72%
5Advanced Micro DevicesAMD5.63%
6Eli Lilly andLLY4.85%
7JPMorgan ChaseJPM4.40%
8VisaV3.90%
9MastercardMA2.83%
10AbbVieABBV2.80%
11IntelINTC2.68%
12Cisco SystemsCSCO2.62%
13Bank of AmericaBAC2.17%
14Lam ResearchLRCX2.17%
15The Procter & GamblePG2.06%
16MerckMRK2.03%
17Palo Alto NetworksPANW1.85%
18GE AerospaceGE1.84%
19NetflixNFLX1.68%
20Costco WholesaleCOST1.64%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology56.5%
Financials13.3%
Communication Services12.4%
Health Care9.7%
Consumer Staples3.7%
Industrials3.4%
Consumer Discretionary1.1%
Industry breakdown
Semiconductors23.4%
Computer Manufacturing14.3%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software12.1%
Computer Software: Programming Data Processing10.7%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations9.7%
Business Services6.7%
Major Banks6.6%
Consumer Electronics/Appliances3.4%
Computer Communications Equipment2.6%
Semiconductor Equipment2.2%
Package Goods/Cosmetics2.1%
Computer peripheral equipment1.9%
Consumer Electronics/Video Chains1.7%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores1.6%
RETAIL: Building Materials1.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 749well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 749, with the top 10 holdings at just 72.8% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 56% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 64% of its holdings with BAMG (16 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 232 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 69.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.14% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

CDEI comments

Leave a one-line take on Calvert US Large-Cap Diversity Equity and Inclusion Index ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.