--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF (DSTL) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexDistillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value Index
Annual fee0.39%
Net assets$2.1B
InceptionOct 24, 2018

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Distillate. It tracks the Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.39%; net assets about $2.1B; inception Oct 24, 2018. Its 1-year return is +19.51%.

Index tracked
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value Index
Provider
Distillate
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.1B
Inception
Oct 24, 2018
1-year return
+19.51%
Holdings
103
52-week range
$56.08–$70.33
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Distillate. It tracks the Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.39%; net assets about $2.1B; inception Oct 24, 2018. Its 1-year return is +19.51%.

Index tracked
Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value Index
Provider
Distillate
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.1B
Inception
Oct 24, 2018
1-year return
+19.51%
Holdings
103
52-week range
$56.08–$70.33

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 37.71%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 37.71%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
48.9%
Top-10 weight
418
Concentration HHI (Low)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 48.9% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 418 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Health Care (30%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 41887

Concentration is below 1,500 (418), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 30%92

The largest sector is Health Care at 30% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.39%/yr70

0.39% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.9% goes to fees.

Fund size$2.1B62

Net assets of $2.1B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 41887

Concentration is below 1,500 (418), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 30%92

The largest sector is Health Care at 30% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.39%/yr70

0.39% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.9% goes to fees.

Fund size$2.1B62

Net assets of $2.1B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 37.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1UnitedHealthUNH5.54%
2SalesforceCRM5.54%
3AbbVieABBV5.36%
4Marathon PetroleumMPC5.28%
5AccentureACN5.25%
6MerckMRK5.09%
7ComcastCMCSA4.43%
8BookingBKNG4.27%
9Uber TechnologiesUBER4.14%
10AltriaMO3.98%
11AdobeADBE3.90%
12The CignaCI3.82%
13PayPalPYPL3.66%
14Lowe's CompaniesLOW3.63%
15T-Mobile USTMUS3.61%
16Diamondback EnergyFANG3.58%
17Regeneron PharmaceuticalsREGN3.50%
18IntuitINTU3.50%
19VistraVST3.23%
20Automatic Data ProcessingADP3.23%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care29.5%
Information Technology21.4%
Consumer Discretionary12.0%
Financials9.8%
Energy8.9%
Communication Services8.0%
Consumer Staples4.0%
Utilities3.2%
Industry breakdown
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations13.9%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software12.9%
Business Services9.4%
Medical Specialities9.4%
Other Pharmaceuticals6.2%
Specialty Insurers6.2%
Integrated oil Companies5.3%
Cable & Other Pay Television Services4.4%
Transportation Services4.3%
Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products4.0%
Diversified Commercial Services3.7%
RETAIL: Building Materials3.6%
Telecommunications Equipment3.6%
Oil & Gas Production3.6%
Electric Utilities: Central3.2%
EDP Services3.2%
Air Freight/Delivery Services3.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 418well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 418, with the top 10 holdings at just 48.9% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Health Care(30%) · Information Technology(21%) · Consumer Discretionary(12%), and even the largest is only 30% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, COWZ, overlaps only 33% (10 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 103 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 37.7% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.39% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

DSTL comments

Leave a one-line take on Distillate U.S. Fundamental Stability & Value ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.