--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Global X Gold Explorers ETF (GOEX) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed

6 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 22.02%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

6 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 22.02%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

-0.01%p
Theoretical day return
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1820
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Materials
Top sector

Today's summary

On a constituent basis, Global X Gold Explorers ETF's theoretical return is -0.01%p. Today's biggest hero is Aris Mining, contributing -0.01%p (return -0.52%). The biggest suspect dragging it down is Aris Mining, at -0.01%p.

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1820 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Materials (41%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

67/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,82030

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,820) — moderate.

Sector balanceMaterials 41%74

Materials is 41%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for Global X Gold Explorers ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

67/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,82030

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,820) — moderate.

Sector balanceMaterials 41%74

Materials is 41%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for Global X Gold Explorers ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Top 6 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 6 holdings, 22.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Equinox GoldEQX24.21%
2Hecla MiningHL21.30%
3Coeur MiningCDE16.53%
4SSR MiningSSRM15.94%
5Discovery MiningDSV.NE13.35%
6Aris MiningARIS8.67%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Materials40.7%
Industrials37.2%
Unclassified22.0%
Industry breakdown
Precious Metals56.7%
Unclassified22.0%
Mining & Quarrying of Nonmetallic Minerals (No Fuels)21.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,820concentrated
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Global X Gold Explorers ETF leans heavily on a handful of names. Its concentration index (HHI) is 1820, and the top 10 holdings make up 100.0% of equity weight — closer to owning a few stocks than a diversified basket.

If you bought it for diversification, note that when one or two of those names move sharply, most of the fund's day comes from them.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Materials(41%) · Industrials(37%) · Unclassified(22%). At 41%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, GDXJ, overlaps only 17% (4 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 25 positions in total; this page lists the largest 6 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 22.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

GOEX comments

Leave a one-line take on Global X Gold Explorers ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.