--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF (GOVI) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-05-31
IndexInvesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF
Annual fee0.15%
Net assets$1.2B
InceptionOct 11, 2007

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF. Key facts — expense ratio 0.15%; net assets about $1.2B; inception Oct 11, 2007. Its 1-year return is -5.05%.

Index tracked
Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.2B
Inception
Oct 11, 2007
1-year return
-5.05%
Holdings
31
52-week range
$25.04–$28.32
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF. Key facts — expense ratio 0.15%; net assets about $1.2B; inception Oct 11, 2007. Its 1-year return is -5.05%.

Index tracked
Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.2B
Inception
Oct 11, 2007
1-year return
-5.05%
Holdings
31
52-week range
$25.04–$28.32

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

GOVI comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco Equal Weight 0-30 Year Treasury ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.