GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF (HIPS) holdings & weights
Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read
Fund overview
This is a US-listed ETF from GraniteShares. It tracks the EQM High Income Pass-Through Securities Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1.17%; net assets about $95M; inception Jan 6, 2015. Its 1-year return is +0.99%.
Fund details
Fund overview
This is a US-listed ETF from GraniteShares. It tracks the EQM High Income Pass-Through Securities Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1.17%; net assets about $95M; inception Jan 6, 2015. Its 1-year return is +0.99%.
25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 66.64%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.
Weight and calculation basis
25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 66.64%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.
Today's summary
On a constituent basis, GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF's theoretical return is -0.01%p. Today's biggest hero is Alliance Resource Partners, contributing -0.01%p (return -0.19%). The biggest suspect dragging it down is Alliance Resource Partners, at -0.01%p.
Its top 10 holdings make up about 44.1% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 404 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Financials (52%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.
Structural health
A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.
Concentration is below 1,500 (404), so no single holding dominates.
Financials is 52%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.
1.17% a year is on the high side — about 11.7% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.
Net assets of $95M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.
A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.
Concentration and diversification
Structural health
A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.
Concentration is below 1,500 (404), so no single holding dominates.
Financials is 52%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.
1.17% a year is on the high side — about 11.7% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.
Net assets of $95M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.
A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.
Top 20 holdings
Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.
Normalized to 100% of analysed positions
Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.
| # | Holding | Weight |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dorchester MineralsDMLP | 4.83% |
| 2 | Black Stone MineralsBSM | 4.58% |
| 3 | MPLXMPLX | 4.49% |
| 4 | Alliance Resource PartnersARLP | 4.46% |
| 5 | Capital SouthwestCSWC | 4.44% |
| 6 | CVR PartnersUAN | 4.44% |
| 7 | Enterprise Products PartnersEPD | 4.34% |
| 8 | BlackRock Enhanced Large Cap Core FundCII | 4.29% |
| 9 | Kimbell Royalty PartnersKRP | 4.14% |
| 10 | FS KKR CapitalFSK | 4.11% |
| 11 | Delek Logistics PartnersDKL | 4.02% |
| 12 | Plains All American PipelinePAA | 3.95% |
| 13 | Barings BDCBBDC | 3.92% |
| 14 | Nuveen Floating Rate Income FundJFR | 3.90% |
| 15 | Western Midstream PartnersWES | 3.84% |
| 16 | New Mountain FinanceNMFC | 3.78% |
| 17 | Goldman Sachs BDCGSBD | 3.77% |
| 18 | Golub Capital BDCGBDC | 3.74% |
| 19 | BlackRock Floating Rate Income Strategies FundFRA | 3.62% |
| 20 | Franklin Duration Income TrustFTF | 3.62% |
Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.
Where the weight sits — sector mix
Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.
Industry breakdown
HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.
How concentrated is it
Concentration (HHI) is low at 404, with the top 10 holdings at just 44.1% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.
Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.
HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.
Where the sector weight sits
By sector, Financials alone is 52% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.
Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.
Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.
How much it overlaps others
Even its closest peer, VPC, overlaps only 18% (6 shared names).
Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.
What it is made of
The fund holds 42 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".
Equities are 66.6% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.
The expense ratio is 1.17% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.
This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.
HIPS comments
Leave a one-line take on GraniteShares HIPS US High Income ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.
Loading…
Similar ETFs
Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.