--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF (ICOW) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexPacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index
Annual fee0.65%
Net assets$1.8B
InceptionJun 16, 2017

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Pacer. It tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.65%; net assets about $1.8B; inception Jun 16, 2017. Its 1-year return is +19.91%.

Index tracked
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index
Provider
Pacer
Expense ratio
0.65%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.8B
Inception
Jun 16, 2017
1-year return
+19.91%
Holdings
110
52-week range
$37–$46.08
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Pacer. It tracks the Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.65%; net assets about $1.8B; inception Jun 16, 2017. Its 1-year return is +19.91%.

Index tracked
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 Index
Provider
Pacer
Expense ratio
0.65%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.8B
Inception
Jun 16, 2017
1-year return
+19.91%
Holdings
110
52-week range
$37–$46.08

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

ICOW comments

Leave a one-line take on Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.