--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Franklin Income Focus ETF (INCM) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-14

13 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 15.52%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

13 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 15.52%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

0.00%p
Theoretical day return
83.2%
Top-10 weight
832
Concentration HHI (Low)
Energy
Top sector

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 83.2% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 832 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Energy (28%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 83261

Concentration is below 1,500 (832), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceEnergy 28%95

The largest sector is Energy at 28% — industries are reasonably spread.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for Franklin Income Focus ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 83261

Concentration is below 1,500 (832), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceEnergy 28%95

The largest sector is Energy at 28% — industries are reasonably spread.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for Franklin Income Focus ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Top 13 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 13 holdings, 15.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1The Procter & GamblePG13.27%
2ExxonMobilXOM10.76%
3ChevronCVX9.86%
4ShellSHEL7.54%
5The Home DepotHD7.41%
6PepsiCoPEP7.41%
7Duke EnergyDUK7.41%
8The SouthernSO6.77%
9RocheRHHBY6.57%
10NestléNSRGY6.19%
11Bank of AmericaBAC5.99%
12Air Products and ChemicalsAPD5.54%
13Philip Morris InternationalPM5.28%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Energy28.2%
Consumer Staples26.0%
Utilities14.2%
Unclassified12.8%
Consumer Discretionary7.4%
Financials6.0%
Materials5.5%
Industry breakdown
Integrated oil Companies20.6%
Package Goods/Cosmetics13.3%
Unclassified12.8%
Oil & Gas Production7.5%
RETAIL: Building Materials7.4%
Beverages (Production/Distribution)7.4%
Power Generation7.4%
Electric Utilities: Central6.8%
Major Banks6.0%
Major Chemicals5.5%
Medicinal Chemicals and Botanical Products5.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 832well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 832, with the top 10 holdings at just 83.2% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Energy(28%) · Consumer Staples(26%) · Utilities(14%), and even the largest is only 28% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, SCHV, overlaps only 21% (6 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 25 positions in total; this page lists the largest 13 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 15.5% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

INCM comments

Leave a one-line take on Franklin Income Focus ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.