--:-- ET
ETF analysis

iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (LQD) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexiBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Annual fee0.14%
Net assets$28.8B
InceptionJul 22, 2002

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.14%; net assets about $28.8B; inception Jul 22, 2002. Its 1-year return is -3.61%.

Index tracked
iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.14%
Net assets (AUM)
$28.8B
Inception
Jul 22, 2002
1-year return
-3.61%
Holdings
3,183
52-week range
$101.195–$112.93
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.14%; net assets about $28.8B; inception Jul 22, 2002. Its 1-year return is -3.61%.

Index tracked
iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.14%
Net assets (AUM)
$28.8B
Inception
Jul 22, 2002
1-year return
-3.61%
Holdings
3,183
52-week range
$101.195–$112.93

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

LQD comments

Leave a one-line take on iShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.