--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF (MNZL) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-09
IndexRussell Ideal Ratings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index
Annual fee0.4%
Net assets$35M
InceptionNov 19, 2025

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Manzil. It tracks the Russell Ideal Ratings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about $35M; inception Nov 19, 2025.

Index tracked
Russell Ideal Ratings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index
Provider
Manzil
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
$35M
Inception
Nov 19, 2025
Holdings
488
52-week range
$48.79–$64.99
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Manzil. It tracks the Russell Ideal Ratings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about $35M; inception Nov 19, 2025.

Index tracked
Russell Ideal Ratings Manzil Halal USA Broad Market Custom Index
Provider
Manzil
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
$35M
Inception
Nov 19, 2025
Holdings
488
52-week range
$48.79–$64.99

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 55.02%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 55.02%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
76.4%
Top-10 weight
1222
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 76.4% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1222 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (70%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

52/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,22246

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,222), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 70%25

Information Technology alone is 70%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund size$35M0

Net assets of $35M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

52/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,22246

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,222), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 70%25

Information Technology alone is 70%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund size$35M0

Net assets of $35M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 55.0% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1AppleAAPL29.86%
2BroadcomAVGO10.00%
3Micron TechnologyMU6.76%
4TeslaTSLA6.67%
5Advanced Micro DevicesAMD5.85%
6Eli Lilly andLLY5.71%
7Johnson & JohnsonJNJ3.85%
8AbbVieABBV3.02%
9Applied MaterialsAMAT2.38%
10Lam ResearchLRCX2.34%
11MerckMRK2.18%
12The Procter & GamblePG2.16%
13Palo Alto NetworksPANW1.96%
14The Home DepotHD1.76%
15GE VernovaGEV1.62%
16CrowdStrikeCRWD1.60%
17Texas InstrumentsTXN1.55%
18KLAKLAC1.51%
19Thermo Fisher ScientificTMO1.49%
20Marvell TechnologyMRVL1.40%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology70.2%
Health Care16.3%
Consumer Discretionary8.4%
Consumer Staples2.2%
Industrials1.6%
Materials1.4%
Industry breakdown
Computer Manufacturing29.9%
Semiconductors26.8%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations14.8%
Auto Manufacturing6.7%
Semiconductor Equipment6.2%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software2.7%
Package Goods/Cosmetics2.2%
Computer peripheral equipment2.0%
RETAIL: Building Materials1.8%
Consumer Electronics/Appliances1.6%
Industrial Machinery/Components1.5%
Major Chemicals1.4%
Computer Communications Equipment1.3%
Electronic Components1.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,222moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1222 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 76.4% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 70% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 45% of its holdings with HLAL (15 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 488 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 55.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.4% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

MNZL comments

Leave a one-line take on Manzil Russell Halal USA Broad Market ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.