--:-- ET
ETF analysis

ProShares Ultra MidCap400 (MVV) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

Leverage/Inverse 2xUS-listed
IndexS&P Mid Cap 400
Annual fee0.95%
Net assets$146M
InceptionJun 19, 2006

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from ProShares. It tracks the S&P Mid Cap 400. Key facts — expense ratio 0.95%; net assets about $146M; inception Jun 19, 2006. Its 1-year return is +22.25%.

Index tracked
S&P Mid Cap 400
Provider
ProShares
Expense ratio
0.95%
Net assets (AUM)
$146M
Inception
Jun 19, 2006
1-year return
+22.25%
Holdings
410
52-week range
$62.12–$94.881
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from ProShares. It tracks the S&P Mid Cap 400. Key facts — expense ratio 0.95%; net assets about $146M; inception Jun 19, 2006. Its 1-year return is +22.25%.

Index tracked
S&P Mid Cap 400
Provider
ProShares
Expense ratio
0.95%
Net assets (AUM)
$146M
Inception
Jun 19, 2006
1-year return
+22.25%
Holdings
410
52-week range
$62.12–$94.881

17 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 8.76%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

17 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 8.76%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

-0.02%p
Theoretical day return
63.0%
Top-10 weight
599
Concentration HHI (Low)
Industrials
Top sector

Today's summary

On a constituent basis, ProShares Ultra MidCap400's theoretical return is -0.02%p. Today's biggest hero is ATI, contributing -0.02%p (return -4.10%). The biggest suspect dragging it down is ATI, at -0.02%p.

Its top 10 holdings make up about 63.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 599 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Industrials (24%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

52/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 59973

Concentration is below 1,500 (599), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 24%100

The largest sector is Industrials at 24% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.95%/yr22

0.95% a year is on the high side — about 9.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$146M18

Net assets of $146M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityLeveraged 2x35

A 2x leveraged fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 2". Built for short holds.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

52/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 59973

Concentration is below 1,500 (599), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 24%100

The largest sector is Industrials at 24% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.95%/yr22

0.95% a year is on the high side — about 9.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$146M18

Net assets of $146M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityLeveraged 2x35

A 2x leveraged fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 2". Built for short holds.

Top 17 holdings

7 derivative positions are excluded. Stock contributions do not explain the entire ETF return.

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 17 holdings, 8.8% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1OktaOKTA8.22%
2TechnipFMCFTI7.31%
3ATIATI6.73%
4nVent ElectricNVT6.16%
5United TherapeuticsUTHR6.05%
6US FoodsUSFD5.82%
7XPOXPO5.82%
8Tenet HealthcareTHC5.71%
9EntegrisENTG5.59%
10RelianceRS5.59%
11Permian ResourcesPR5.48%
12RokuROKU5.48%
13Royal GoldRGLD5.37%
14TD SYNNEXSNX5.25%
15WoodwardWWD5.14%
16HF SinclairDINO5.14%
17OvintivOVV5.14%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Industrials23.9%
Energy20.9%
Information Technology19.1%
Consumer Discretionary18.9%
Health Care11.8%
Communication Services5.5%
Industry breakdown
Industrial Machinery/Components11.3%
Oil & Gas Production10.6%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software8.2%
Oil and Gas Field Machinery7.3%
Steel/Iron Ore6.7%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations6.0%
Food Distributors5.8%
Transportation Services5.8%
Hospital/Nursing Management5.7%
Semiconductor Equipment5.6%
Metal Fabrications5.6%
Cable & Other Pay Television Services5.5%
Precious Metals5.4%
Retail: Computer Software & Peripheral Equipment5.3%
Natural Gas Distribution5.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 599well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

Leverage / inverse caveat

This fund tracks its index at 2x.

That 2x applies to a **single day**. Held longer, the daily reset makes the period return drift from 2x the index: if the index chops up and down and returns to where it started, this fund is still down. That is volatility decay.

It bites hardest in sideways markets and compounds with holding time. These are built for short directional trades.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 599, with the top 10 holdings at just 63.0% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Industrials(24%) · Energy(21%) · Information Technology(19%), and even the largest is only 24% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, MYY, overlaps only 33% (3 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 410 positions in total; this page lists the largest 17 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 8.8% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.95% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

MVV comments

Leave a one-line take on ProShares Ultra MidCap400. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.