--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF (NXTI) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-09
IndexNext Intangible Core Index
Annual fee0.25%
Net assets$15M
InceptionApr 15, 2024

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Simplify. It tracks the Next Intangible Core Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.25%; net assets about $15M; inception Apr 15, 2024. Its 1-year return is +11.79%.

Index tracked
Next Intangible Core Index
Provider
Simplify
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets (AUM)
$15M
Inception
Apr 15, 2024
1-year return
+11.79%
Holdings
202
52-week range
$29.097–$37.086
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Simplify. It tracks the Next Intangible Core Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.25%; net assets about $15M; inception Apr 15, 2024. Its 1-year return is +11.79%.

Index tracked
Next Intangible Core Index
Provider
Simplify
Expense ratio
0.25%
Net assets (AUM)
$15M
Inception
Apr 15, 2024
1-year return
+11.79%
Holdings
202
52-week range
$29.097–$37.086

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 55.22%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 55.22%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
64.4%
Top-10 weight
561
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 64.4% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 561 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (64%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

63/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 56176

Concentration is below 1,500 (561), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 64%34

Information Technology alone is 64%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.25%/yr83

0.25% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.5% goes to fees.

Fund size$15M0

Net assets of $15M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

63/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 56176

Concentration is below 1,500 (561), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 64%34

Information Technology alone is 64%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.25%/yr83

0.25% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 2.5% goes to fees.

Fund size$15M0

Net assets of $15M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 24 holdings, 55.2% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Palantir TechnologiesPLTR10.12%
2Cisco SystemsCSCO8.84%
3Johnson & JohnsonJNJ8.53%
4WalmartWMT8.13%
5Dell TechnologiesDELL6.90%
6Berkshire HathawayBRK.B5.79%
7CrowdStrikeCRWD4.85%
8International Business MachinesIBM3.88%
9SalesforceCRM3.73%
10MastercardMA3.66%
11Seagate TechnologySTX3.55%
12ExxonMobilXOM3.42%
13QUALCOMMQCOM3.17%
14Western DigitalWDC2.97%
15ServiceNowNOW2.84%
16SnowflakeSNOW2.72%
17FortinetFTNT2.48%
18GE AerospaceGE2.30%
19CloudflareNET2.16%
20Cadence Design SystemsCDNS2.08%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology64.3%
Health Care10.4%
Financials9.4%
Consumer Staples8.1%
Industrials4.2%
Energy3.4%
Industry breakdown
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software30.5%
Computer Manufacturing10.8%
Computer Communications Equipment8.8%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations8.5%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores8.1%
Electronic Components6.5%
Unclassified5.8%
Business Services3.7%
Integrated oil Companies3.4%
Semiconductors3.2%
Computer peripheral equipment2.5%
Consumer Electronics/Appliances2.3%
Semiconductor Equipment2.0%
Construction/Ag Equipment/Trucks1.9%
Medical Specialities1.9%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 561well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 561, with the top 10 holdings at just 64.4% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 64% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, XMAG, overlaps only 20% (10 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 202 positions in total; this page lists the largest 24 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 55.2% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.25% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

NXTI comments

Leave a one-line take on Simplify Next Intangible Core Index ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.