--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Portfolio (PWZ) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-15
IndexICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni
Annual fee0.28%
Net assets$1.2B
InceptionOct 11, 2007

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Key facts — expense ratio 0.28%; net assets about $1.2B; inception Oct 11, 2007. Its 1-year return is -3.01%.

Index tracked
ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.28%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.2B
Inception
Oct 11, 2007
1-year return
-3.01%
Holdings
1,279
52-week range
$22.03–$24.59
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni. Key facts — expense ratio 0.28%; net assets about $1.2B; inception Oct 11, 2007. Its 1-year return is -3.01%.

Index tracked
ICE BofA California Long-Term Core Plus Muni
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.28%
Net assets (AUM)
$1.2B
Inception
Oct 11, 2007
1-year return
-3.01%
Holdings
1,279
52-week range
$22.03–$24.59

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

PWZ comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco California AMT-Free Municipal Bond Portfolio. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.