--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF (QSIX) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexMetaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 600
Annual fee0.6%
Net assets$21M
InceptionSep 23, 2024

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Pacer. It tracks the Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 600. Key facts — expense ratio 0.6%; net assets about $21M; inception Sep 23, 2024. Its 1-year return is +17.65%.

Index tracked
Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 600
Provider
Pacer
Expense ratio
0.6%
Net assets (AUM)
$21M
Inception
Sep 23, 2024
1-year return
+17.65%
Holdings
107
52-week range
$33.94–$44.34
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Pacer. It tracks the Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 600. Key facts — expense ratio 0.6%; net assets about $21M; inception Sep 23, 2024. Its 1-year return is +17.65%.

Index tracked
Metaurus Nasdaq-100 Dividend Multiplier Index - Series 600
Provider
Pacer
Expense ratio
0.6%
Net assets (AUM)
$21M
Inception
Sep 23, 2024
1-year return
+17.65%
Holdings
107
52-week range
$33.94–$44.34

20 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 62.06%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

20 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 62.06%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
70.4%
Top-10 weight
664
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 70.4% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 664 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (67%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 66469

Concentration is below 1,500 (664), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 67%31

Information Technology alone is 67%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.6%/yr52

0.6% a year is on the high side — about 6.0% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$21M0

Net assets of $21M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 66469

Concentration is below 1,500 (664), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 67%31

Information Technology alone is 67%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.6%/yr52

0.6% a year is on the high side — about 6.0% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$21M0

Net assets of $21M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 20 holdings, 62.1% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1NVIDIANVDA12.10%
2AppleAAPL11.54%
3MicrosoftMSFT9.26%
4Micron TechnologyMU6.72%
5Amazon.comAMZN6.35%
6Advanced Micro DevicesAMD5.86%
7Meta PlatformsMETA5.06%
8AlphabetGOOGL4.74%
9AlphabetGOOG4.41%
10TeslaTSLA4.40%
11Space Exploration TechnologiesSPCX4.08%
12BroadcomAVGO3.79%
13WalmartWMT3.66%
14IntelINTC3.21%
15Palantir TechnologiesPLTR2.95%
16Costco WholesaleCOST2.77%
17Cisco SystemsCSCO2.77%
18Lam ResearchLRCX2.22%
19Applied MaterialsAMAT2.18%
20NetflixNFLX1.93%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology66.7%
Communication Services16.1%
Consumer Discretionary10.8%
Consumer Staples6.4%
Industry breakdown
Semiconductors31.7%
Computer Software: Programming Data Processing18.3%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software12.2%
Computer Manufacturing11.5%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores6.4%
Catalog/Specialty Distribution6.3%
Auto Manufacturing4.4%
Semiconductor Equipment4.4%
Computer Communications Equipment2.8%
Consumer Electronics/Video Chains1.9%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 664well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 664, with the top 10 holdings at just 70.4% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 67% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 79% of its holdings with QYLG (20 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 107 positions in total; this page lists the largest 20 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 62.1% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.6% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

QSIX comments

Leave a one-line take on Pacer Metaurus Nasdaq 100 Dividend Multiplier 600 ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.