--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF (RWJ) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index
Annual fee0.39%
Net assets$2.0B
InceptionFeb 22, 2008

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.39%; net assets about $2.0B; inception Feb 22, 2008. Its 1-year return is +22.13%.

Index tracked
S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.0B
Inception
Feb 22, 2008
1-year return
+22.13%
Holdings
605
52-week range
$44.7–$62.86
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.39%; net assets about $2.0B; inception Feb 22, 2008. Its 1-year return is +22.13%.

Index tracked
S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue-Weighted Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.39%
Net assets (AUM)
$2.0B
Inception
Feb 22, 2008
1-year return
+22.13%
Holdings
605
52-week range
$44.7–$62.86

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 25.12%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 25.12%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
55.7%
Top-10 weight
495
Concentration HHI (Low)
Consumer Discretionary
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 55.7% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 495 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Consumer Discretionary (61%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

73/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 49581

Concentration is below 1,500 (495), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 61%41

Consumer Discretionary alone is 61%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.39%/yr70

0.39% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.9% goes to fees.

Fund size$2.0B61

Net assets of $2.0B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

73/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 49581

Concentration is below 1,500 (495), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 61%41

Consumer Discretionary alone is 61%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.39%/yr70

0.39% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.9% goes to fees.

Fund size$2.0B61

Net assets of $2.0B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 25.1% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1World KinectWKC10.91%
2United Natural FoodsUNFI8.60%
3CarMaxKMX6.41%
4Kohl'sKSS4.90%
5Lincoln NationalLNC4.86%
6Group 1 AutomotiveGPI4.82%
7DXC TechnologyDXC3.98%
8AdientADNT3.82%
9Asbury AutomotiveABG3.70%
10AmentumAMTM3.66%
11ManpowerGroupMAN3.54%
12The Goodyear Tire & RubberGT3.38%
13Sonic AutomotiveSAH3.30%
14Builders FirstSourceBLDR3.30%
15LKQLKQ3.22%
16Delek USDK3.14%
17Molson Coors BeverageTAP2.94%
18Caesars EntertainmentCZR2.91%
19CVR EnergyCVI2.83%
20Conagra BrandsCAG2.79%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Consumer Discretionary60.7%
Energy16.9%
Information Technology6.7%
Consumer Staples5.7%
Industrials5.2%
Financials4.9%
Industry breakdown
Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations18.2%
Oil Refining/Marketing10.9%
Food Distributors8.6%
Integrated oil Companies6.0%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores4.9%
Life Insurance4.9%
EDP Services4.0%
Auto Parts:O.E.M.3.8%
Business Services3.7%
Professional Services3.5%
Automotive Aftermarket3.4%
RETAIL: Building Materials3.3%
Motor Vehicles3.2%
Beverages (Production/Distribution)3.0%
Hotels/Resorts2.9%
Packaged Foods2.8%
Home Furnishings2.7%
Major Chemicals2.7%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software2.7%
Farming/Seeds/Milling2.5%
Diversified Commercial Services2.4%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 495well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 495, with the top 10 holdings at just 55.7% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Consumer Discretionary alone is 61% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, IJS, overlaps only 24% (9 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 605 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 25.1% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.39% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

RWJ comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco S&P SmallCap 600 Revenue ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.