--:-- ET
ETF analysis

AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF (SAWS) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
Annual fee0.55%
Net assets$8M
InceptionJul 30, 2024

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Advisors Asset Management. Key facts — expense ratio 0.55%; net assets about $8M; inception Jul 30, 2024. Its 1-year return is +7.66%.

Provider
Advisors Asset Management
Expense ratio
0.55%
Net assets (AUM)
$8M
Inception
Jul 30, 2024
1-year return
+7.66%
Holdings
74
52-week range
$19.773–$26.05
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Advisors Asset Management. Key facts — expense ratio 0.55%; net assets about $8M; inception Jul 30, 2024. Its 1-year return is +7.66%.

Provider
Advisors Asset Management
Expense ratio
0.55%
Net assets (AUM)
$8M
Inception
Jul 30, 2024
1-year return
+7.66%
Holdings
74
52-week range
$19.773–$26.05

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 53.51%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 53.51%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
52.0%
Top-10 weight
428
Concentration HHI (Low)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 52.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 428 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Health Care (29%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

72/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 42886

Concentration is below 1,500 (428), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 29%93

The largest sector is Health Care at 29% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.55%/yr57

0.55% a year is on the high side — about 5.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$8M0

Net assets of $8M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

72/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 42886

Concentration is below 1,500 (428), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 29%93

The largest sector is Health Care at 29% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.55%/yr57

0.55% a year is on the high side — about 5.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$8M0

Net assets of $8M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 53.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1PriceSmartPSMT5.92%
2StoneXSNEX5.85%
3BrightSpring Health ServicesBTSG5.81%
4IRADIMEDIRMD5.79%
5Digi InternationalDGII5.16%
6Guardian Pharmacy ServicesGRDN5.10%
7The Gorman-RuppGRC4.73%
8SanminaSANM4.71%
9BioventusBVS4.50%
10Mueller IndustriesMLI4.43%
11Krystal BiotechKRYS3.72%
12CareDxCDNA3.61%
13Advanced Energy IndustriesAEIS3.57%
14Laureate EducationLAUR3.36%
15Granite ConstructionGVA3.23%
16Monarch Casino & ResortMCRI3.18%
17The PennantPNTG3.16%
18ESCO TechnologiesESE3.14%
19Riley Exploration PermianREPX3.10%
20Applied Industrial TechnologiesAIT3.08%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care29.5%
Consumer Discretionary21.3%
Industrials12.4%
Communication Services8.3%
Information Technology8.3%
Energy6.0%
Financials5.8%
Consumer Staples5.1%
Industry breakdown
Medical/Nursing Services11.9%
Medical/Dental Instruments10.3%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores5.9%
Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service5.8%
Computer Communications Equipment5.2%
Retail-Drug Stores and Proprietary Stores5.1%
Fluid Controls4.7%
Electrical Products4.7%
Metal Fabrications4.4%
Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)3.7%
Medical Specialities3.6%
Industrial Machinery/Components3.6%
Other Consumer Services3.4%
Military/Government/Technical3.2%
Hotels/Resorts3.2%
Telecommunications Equipment3.1%
Oil & Gas Production3.1%
Industrial Specialties3.1%
Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations3.1%
Other Specialty Stores3.1%
Business Services3.0%
Oilfield Services/Equipment2.9%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 428well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 428, with the top 10 holdings at just 52.0% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Health Care(29%) · Consumer Discretionary(21%) · Industrials(12%), and even the largest is only 29% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, AESG, overlaps only 11% (5 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 74 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 53.5% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.55% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

SAWS comments

Leave a one-line take on AAM Sawgrass US Small Cap Quality Growth ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.