--:-- ET
ETF analysis

VanEck Steel ETF (SLX) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed

14 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 61.93%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

14 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 61.93%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
87.6%
Top-10 weight
859
Concentration HHI (Low)
Materials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 87.6% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 859 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Materials (45%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

75/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 85959

Concentration is below 1,500 (859), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceMaterials 45%67

Materials is 45%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for VanEck Steel ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

75/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 85959

Concentration is below 1,500 (859), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceMaterials 45%67

Materials is 45%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

We don't have cost, fund size for VanEck Steel ETF yet, so those axes are excluded and the score is based on the other 3. Scoring a missing figure as zero would grade our data collection, not the fund.

Top 14 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 14 holdings, 61.9% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1BHPBHP11.45%
2NucorNUE11.35%
3Rio TintoRIO11.03%
4ValeVALE10.42%
5Steel DynamicsSTLD8.78%
6ArcelorMittalMT8.62%
7RelianceRS8.24%
8POSCOPKX6.96%
9TenarisTS6.65%
10SSAB AB (publ)SSABF4.13%
11GerdauGGB3.73%
12Commercial MetalsCMC3.33%
13Cleveland-CliffsCLF3.29%
14TerniumTX2.02%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Materials44.9%
Industrials39.5%
Energy11.4%
Unclassified4.1%
Industry breakdown
Steel/Iron Ore51.5%
Metal Mining24.7%
Coal Mining11.4%
Metal Fabrications8.2%
Unclassified4.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 859well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 859, with the top 10 holdings at just 87.6% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Materials(45%) · Industrials(40%) · Energy(11%). At 45%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, XME, overlaps only 20% (5 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 25 positions in total; this page lists the largest 14 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 61.9% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

SLX comments

Leave a one-line take on VanEck Steel ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.