--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF (SOXS) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

Leverage/Inverse -3xUS-listedAs of 2026-10-20
IndexNYSE Semiconductor Index
Annual fee1%
Net assets$3.7B
InceptionMar 11, 2010

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Direxion. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1%; net assets about $3.7B; inception Mar 11, 2010. Its 1-year return is -93.93%.

Index tracked
NYSE Semiconductor Index
Provider
Direxion
Expense ratio
1%
Net assets (AUM)
$3.7B
Inception
Mar 11, 2010
1-year return
-93.93%
Holdings
12
52-week range
$28.46–$1030
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Direxion. It tracks the NYSE Semiconductor Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1%; net assets about $3.7B; inception Mar 11, 2010. Its 1-year return is -93.93%.

Index tracked
NYSE Semiconductor Index
Provider
Direxion
Expense ratio
1%
Net assets (AUM)
$3.7B
Inception
Mar 11, 2010
1-year return
-93.93%
Holdings
12
52-week range
$28.46–$1030

30 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV -300.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Underlying allocation is estimated using SOXX (2026-10-19). Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

30 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV -300.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Underlying allocation is estimated using SOXX (2026-10-19). Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
61.7%
Top-10 weight
517
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 61.7% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 517 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

36/ 100
DHigh-risk structure
DiversificationHHI 51779

Concentration is below 1,500 (517), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 100%0

Information Technology alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost1%/yr17

1% a year is on the high side — about 10.0% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$3.7B72

Net assets of $3.7B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityInverse 3x10

A 3x inverse fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 3". Built for short holds.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

36/ 100
DHigh-risk structure
DiversificationHHI 51779

Concentration is below 1,500 (517), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 100%0

Information Technology alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost1%/yr17

1% a year is on the high side — about 10.0% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$3.7B72

Net assets of $3.7B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityInverse 3x10

A 3x inverse fund. It resets exposure daily, so over more than a few days the result drifts from "index move × 3". Built for short holds.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

#HoldingWeight
1ADVANCED MICRO DEVICESAMD9.26% Short
2INTELINTC8.33% Short
3NVIDIANVDA7.96% Short
4MICRON TECHNOLOGYMU7.65% Short
5BROADCOMAVGO7.31% Short
6MARVELL TECHNOLOGYMRVL4.53% Short
7ANALOG DEVICESADI4.40% Short
8TEXAS INSTRUMENTTXN4.28% Short
9QUALCOMMQCOM4.12% Short
10KLAKLAC3.84% Short
11LAM RESEARCHLRCX3.65% Short
12APPLIED MATERIALAMAT3.65% Short
13MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMSMPWR3.32% Short
14NXP SEMICONDUCTORSNXPI3.24% Short
15TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURINGTSM3.13% Short
16TERADYNETER2.91% Short
17SK HYNIX AMERICAN DEPOSITARY SHARESKHY2.69% Short
18ASTERA LABSALAB2.28% Short
19MICROCHIP TECHNOLOGYMCHP2.22% Short
20CREDO TECHNOLOGYCRDO1.63% Short

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology100.0%
Industry breakdown
Semiconductors83.2%
Semiconductor Equipment16.8%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 517well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

Leverage / inverse caveat

This fund tracks 3x the inverse of its index — it rises when the index falls, and vice versa.

That 3x applies to a **single day**. Held longer, the daily reset makes the period return drift from 3x the index: if the index chops up and down and returns to where it started, this fund is still down. That is volatility decay.

It bites hardest in sideways markets and compounds with holding time. These are built for short directional trades.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 517, with the top 10 holdings at just 61.7% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Its closest neighbour is AMDD at 9493% overlap — effectively the same basket.

Holding both is not diversification, it is buying the same companies twice. Pick whichever is cheaper.

What it is made of

Equities are -300.0% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 1% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

SOXS comments

Leave a one-line take on Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3X ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.