--:-- ET
ETF analysis

iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-12
IndexS&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index
Annual fee0.12%
Net assets$208M
InceptionSep 22, 2020

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.12%; net assets about $208M; inception Sep 22, 2020. Its 1-year return is +15.45%.

Index tracked
S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.12%
Net assets (AUM)
$208M
Inception
Sep 22, 2020
1-year return
+15.45%
Holdings
600
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.12%; net assets about $208M; inception Sep 22, 2020. Its 1-year return is +15.45%.

Index tracked
S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.12%
Net assets (AUM)
$208M
Inception
Sep 22, 2020
1-year return
+15.45%
Holdings
600

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 12.10%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 12.10%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
47.0%
Top-10 weight
423
Concentration HHI (Low)
Industrials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 47.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 423 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Industrials (23%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 42387

Concentration is below 1,500 (423), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 23%100

The largest sector is Industrials at 23% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.12%/yr94

At 0.12% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$208M24

Net assets of $208M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

84/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 42387

Concentration is below 1,500 (423), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceIndustrials 23%100

The largest sector is Industrials at 23% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.12%/yr94

At 0.12% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$208M24

Net assets of $208M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 24 holdings, 12.1% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1GlaukosGKOS5.29%
2MatchMTCH5.12%
3Protagonist TherapeuticsPTGX5.04%
4ViasatVSAT5.04%
5Paycom SoftwarePAYC4.88%
6Ryman Hospitality PropertiesRHP4.46%
7Element SolutionsESI4.46%
8Jackson FinancialJXN4.38%
9TG TherapeuticsTGTX4.22%
10Life TimeLTH4.13%
11MaxLinearMXL4.05%
12ArcosaACA3.89%
13Terreno RealtyTRNO3.88%
14CarMaxKMX3.88%
15Eastman ChemicalEMN3.80%
16Victoria's SecretVSXY3.80%
17Federal SignalFSS3.80%
18Lincoln NationalLNC3.72%
19Madison Square Garden SportsMSGS3.72%
20Zurn Elkay Water SolutionsZWS3.72%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Industrials23.4%
Consumer Discretionary19.2%
Information Technology17.7%
Health Care14.6%
Financials12.0%
Communication Services5.0%
Real Estate4.5%
Consumer Staples3.7%
Industry breakdown
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations9.3%
Major Chemicals8.3%
Life Insurance8.1%
Medical/Dental Instruments5.3%
Computer Software: Programming Data Processing5.1%
Telecommunications Equipment5.0%
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software4.9%
Real Estate Investment Trusts4.5%
Hotels/Resorts4.1%
Semiconductors4.0%
Metal Fabrications3.9%
Real Estate3.9%
Retail-Auto Dealers and Gas Stations3.9%
Clothing/Shoe/Accessory Stores3.8%
Auto Manufacturing3.8%
Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation3.7%
Industrial Machinery/Components3.7%
Packaged Foods3.7%
Plastic Products3.7%
Electrical Products3.6%
Marine Transportation3.6%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 423well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 423, with the top 10 holdings at just 47.0% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sectors run Industrials(23%) · Consumer Discretionary(19%) · Information Technology(18%), and even the largest is only 23% — no meaningful industry tilt.

This is built to track a market rather than to call a sector.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 67% of its holdings with IJR (20 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 600 positions in total; this page lists the largest 24 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 12.1% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.12% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

XJR comments

Leave a one-line take on iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.