--:-- ET
ETF analysis

VanEck CEF Muni Income ETF (XMPT) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-13
IndexS-Network Closed End Municipal Bond Fund Index
Annual fee1.97%
Net assets$198M
InceptionJul 12, 2011

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from VanEck. It tracks the S-Network Closed End Municipal Bond Fund Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1.97%; net assets about $198M; inception Jul 12, 2011. Its 1-year return is -5.07%.

Index tracked
S-Network Closed End Municipal Bond Fund Index
Provider
VanEck
Expense ratio
1.97%
Net assets (AUM)
$198M
Inception
Jul 12, 2011
1-year return
-5.07%
Holdings
36
52-week range
$18.795–$22.66
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from VanEck. It tracks the S-Network Closed End Municipal Bond Fund Index. Key facts — expense ratio 1.97%; net assets about $198M; inception Jul 12, 2011. Its 1-year return is -5.07%.

Index tracked
S-Network Closed End Municipal Bond Fund Index
Provider
VanEck
Expense ratio
1.97%
Net assets (AUM)
$198M
Inception
Jul 12, 2011
1-year return
-5.07%
Holdings
36
52-week range
$18.795–$22.66

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 87.15%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

24 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 87.15%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
68.0%
Top-10 weight
556
Concentration HHI (Low)
Financials
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 68.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 556 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Financials (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

45/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 55676

Concentration is below 1,500 (556), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost1.97%/yr0

1.97% a year is on the high side — about 19.7% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$198M23

Net assets of $198M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

45/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 55676

Concentration is below 1,500 (556), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceFinancials 100%0

Financials alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost1.97%/yr0

1.97% a year is on the high side — about 19.7% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$198M23

Net assets of $198M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 24 holdings, 87.2% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Nuveen AMT-Free Quality Municipal Income FundNEA8.57%
2BlackRock MuniHoldings FundMHD8.16%
3Nuveen Quality Municipal Income FundNAD7.92%
4Nuveen Municipal Credit Income FundNZF6.98%
5BlackRock MuniYield Quality FundMQY6.96%
6Nuveen AMT-Free Municipal Credit Income FundNVG6.60%
7Blackrock Municipal 2030 Target Term TrustBTT6.34%
8Nuveen Municipal High Income Opportunity FundNMZ5.63%
9Nuveen Municipal Value FundNUV5.44%
10BlackRock MuniYield Quality Fund IIIMYI5.43%
11PIMCO Municipal Income Fund IIPML4.16%
12BlackRock MuniAssets FundMUA3.38%
13Nuveen Select Tax-Free Income PortfolioNXP2.86%
14Aberdeen Municipal Income FundMFM2.79%
15Western Asset Managed Municipals FundMMU2.59%
16Eaton Vance Municipal Bond FundEIM2.54%
17Invesco Municipal Opportunity TrustVMO2.26%
18BNY Mellon Strategic MunicipalsLEO1.93%
19Invesco Municipal TrustVKQ1.86%
20Invesco Trust for Investment Grade MunicipalsVGM1.64%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Financials100.0%
Industry breakdown
Investment Managers29.1%
Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service23.9%
Finance/Investors Services18.2%
Trusts Except Educational Religious and Charitable17.5%
Finance Companies11.3%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 556well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 556, with the top 10 holdings at just 68.0% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Financials alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, RDFI, overlaps only 7% (2 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 36 positions in total; this page lists the largest 24 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 87.2% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 1.97% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

XMPT comments

Leave a one-line take on VanEck CEF Muni Income ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.