--:-- ET
ETF analysis

BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF (XONE) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-13
IndexBloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Duration Index
Annual fee0.03%
Net assets$841M
InceptionSep 13, 2022

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BondBloxx. It tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Duration Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.03%; net assets about $841M; inception Sep 13, 2022. Its 1-year return is +2.98%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Duration Index
Provider
BondBloxx
Expense ratio
0.03%
Net assets (AUM)
$841M
Inception
Sep 13, 2022
1-year return
+2.98%
Holdings
54
52-week range
$49.02–$49.7
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BondBloxx. It tracks the Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Duration Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.03%; net assets about $841M; inception Sep 13, 2022. Its 1-year return is +2.98%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Treasury 1 Year Duration Index
Provider
BondBloxx
Expense ratio
0.03%
Net assets (AUM)
$841M
Inception
Sep 13, 2022
1-year return
+2.98%
Holdings
54
52-week range
$49.02–$49.7

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

XONE comments

Leave a one-line take on BondBloxx Bloomberg One Year Target Duration US Treasury ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.