--:-- ET
ETF analysis

F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (ZTRE) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-12
IndexBloomberg US Liquid Corporate 3 Year Maturity Index
Annual fee0.15%
Net assets$42M
InceptionJan 10, 2024

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from F/m Investments. It tracks the Bloomberg US Liquid Corporate 3 Year Maturity Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.15%; net assets about $42M; inception Jan 10, 2024. Its 1-year return is +1.09%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Liquid Corporate 3 Year Maturity Index
Provider
F/m Investments
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets (AUM)
$42M
Inception
Jan 10, 2024
1-year return
+1.09%
Holdings
474
52-week range
$49.45–$51.486
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from F/m Investments. It tracks the Bloomberg US Liquid Corporate 3 Year Maturity Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.15%; net assets about $42M; inception Jan 10, 2024. Its 1-year return is +1.09%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Liquid Corporate 3 Year Maturity Index
Provider
F/m Investments
Expense ratio
0.15%
Net assets (AUM)
$42M
Inception
Jan 10, 2024
1-year return
+1.09%
Holdings
474
52-week range
$49.45–$51.486

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

ZTRE comments

Leave a one-line take on F/m 3-Year Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.