--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›261070
ETF analysis

TIGER KOSDAQ150BIOTECH (261070) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listedAs of 2026-10-19
Index코스닥 150 생명기술
Annual fee0.4%
Net assetsKRW 51.8B
Inception2016-12-15

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the 코스닥 150 생명기술. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 51.8B; inception 2016-12-15. Its 1-year return is -28.14%.

Index tracked
코스닥 150 생명기술
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 51.8B
Inception
2016-12-15
1-month return
-0.09%
1-year return
-28.14%
Dividend yield
0.91%
Holdings
27
52-week range
9,640–22,600
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 미래에셋자산운용. It tracks the 코스닥 150 생명기술. Key facts — expense ratio 0.4%; net assets about KRW 51.8B; inception 2016-12-15. Its 1-year return is -28.14%.

Index tracked
코스닥 150 생명기술
Provider
미래에셋자산운용
Expense ratio
0.4%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 51.8B
Inception
2016-12-15
1-month return
-0.09%
1-year return
-28.14%
Dividend yield
0.91%
Holdings
27
52-week range
9,640–22,600

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 98.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 98.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+18.2K sh
Foreign
−23.0K sh
Institution
+4.8K sh
Retail
1.83%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+4.1%+18.2K sh−23.0K sh+4.8K sh
10/16+7.67%−1.3K sh+10.8K sh−9.4K sh
10/15-4.14%+13.1K sh+11.3K sh−20.9K sh
10/14-0.34%−30.4K sh+32.5K sh−2.5K sh
10/13-3.33%−6.4K sh+11.8K sh−5.4K sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

+18.2K sh
Foreign
−23.0K sh
Institution
+4.8K sh
Retail
1.83%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19+4.1%+18.2K sh−23.0K sh+4.8K sh
10/16+7.67%−1.3K sh+10.8K sh−9.4K sh
10/15-4.14%+13.1K sh+11.3K sh−20.9K sh
10/14-0.34%−30.4K sh+32.5K sh−2.5K sh
10/13-3.33%−6.4K sh+11.8K sh−5.4K sh
—
Holdings not priced
72.1%
Top-10 weight
1084
Concentration HHI (Low)
Health Care
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 72.1% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1084 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Health Care (97%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

53/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,08450

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,084), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 97%0

Health Care alone is 97%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 51.8B31

Net assets of KRW 51.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

53/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,08450

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,084), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceHealth Care 97%0

Health Care alone is 97%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.4%/yr70

0.4% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 4.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 51.8B31

Net assets of KRW 51.8B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

1 derivative positions are excluded. Stock contributions do not explain the entire ETF return.

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 98.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Alteogen19617027.55%
2HLB02830010.85%
3삼천당제약0002506.34%
4펩트론0870104.73%
5Pharma Research2144504.25%
6에이비엘바이오2983803.99%
7올릭스2269503.97%
8리가켐바이오1410803.94%
9엘앤씨바이오2906503.40%
10디앤디파마텍3478503.07%
11보로노이3102102.94%
12오스코텍0392002.67%
13에스티팜2376902.57%
14네이처셀0073902.45%
15씨젠0965302.32%
16휴젤1450202.22%
17큐리옥스바이오시스템즈4456802.17%
18Classys2141501.76%
19셀트리온제약0687601.72%
20루닛3281301.69%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Health Care96.5%
생물공학3.5%
Industry breakdown
생물공학45.0%
제약22.0%
건강관리장비와용품20.3%
생명과학도구및서비스8.5%
건강관리업체및서비스2.5%
건강관리기술1.7%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,084moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1084 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 72.1% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Health Care alone is 97% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 44% of its holdings with 244580 (26 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 27 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

The expense ratio is 0.4% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

261070 comments

Leave a one-line take on TIGER 코스닥150바이오테크. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.