--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›270800
ETF analysis

RISE KQ High Dividend (270800) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
IndexFnGuide KQ고배당포커스지수
Annual fee0.3%
Net assetsKRW 8.39B
Inception2017-07-07

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide KQ고배당포커스지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 8.39B; inception 2017-07-07. Its 1-year return is +15.11%.

Index tracked
FnGuide KQ고배당포커스지수
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 8.39B
Inception
2017-07-07
1-month return
-2.09%
1-year return
+15.11%
Dividend yield
2.13%
Holdings
10
52-week range
12,935–19,960
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from KB자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide KQ고배당포커스지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.3%; net assets about KRW 8.39B; inception 2017-07-07. Its 1-year return is +15.11%.

Index tracked
FnGuide KQ고배당포커스지수
Provider
KB자산운용
Expense ratio
0.3%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 8.39B
Inception
2017-07-07
1-month return
-2.09%
1-year return
+15.11%
Dividend yield
2.13%
Holdings
10
52-week range
12,935–19,960

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 41.42%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 41.42%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−688 sh
Foreign
+672 sh
Institution
+16 sh
Retail
0%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-1.93%−688 sh+672 sh+16 sh
10/19-0.61%+688 sh−728 sh+40 sh
10/16+5%0 sh+9 sh−9 sh
10/15-5.69%−42 sh−9 sh+51 sh
10/140%+44 sh−284 sh+240 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−688 sh
Foreign
+672 sh
Institution
+16 sh
Retail
0%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/20-1.93%−688 sh+672 sh+16 sh
10/19-0.61%+688 sh−728 sh+40 sh
10/16+5%0 sh+9 sh−9 sh
10/15-5.69%−42 sh−9 sh+51 sh
10/140%+44 sh−284 sh+240 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1070
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1070 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (36%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,07051

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,070), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 36%81

The largest sector is Information Technology at 36% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 8.4B0

Net assets of KRW 8.4B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

65/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 1,07051

Concentration is below 1,500 (1,070), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 36%81

The largest sector is Information Technology at 36% — industries are reasonably spread.

Cost0.3%/yr78

0.3% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.0% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 8.4B0

Net assets of KRW 8.4B are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 41.4% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1PSK Holdings03198015.16%
2메가스터디교육21520012.17%
3SOOP06716011.98%
4SFA05619011.15%
5Ecopro08652011.06%
6웹젠0690809.34%
7안랩0538008.04%
8컴투스0783407.92%
9KG이니시스0356006.59%
10TES0956106.59%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology36.4%
Communication Services29.2%
Consumer Discretionary12.2%
Industrials11.2%
Materials11.1%
Industry breakdown
반도체와반도체장비21.8%
게임엔터테인먼트17.3%
교육서비스12.2%
양방향미디어와서비스12.0%
기계11.2%
화학11.1%
소프트웨어8.0%
IT서비스6.6%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,070moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1070 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Information Technology(36%) · Communication Services(29%) · Consumer Discretionary(12%). At 36%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, 494220, overlaps only 10% (2 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

Equities are 41.4% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.3% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

270800 comments

Leave a one-line take on RISE KQ고배당. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.