--:-- ET
Home›ETF directory›474590
ETF analysis

WON Semiconductor Value Chain Active (474590) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

KR-listed
IndexFnGuide 반도체 밸류체인 (Price Return) 지수
Annual fee0.31%
Net assetsKRW 308.9B
Inception2024-01-16

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 우리자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 반도체 밸류체인 (Price Return) 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.31%; net assets about KRW 308.9B; inception 2024-01-16. Its 1-year return is +147.04%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 반도체 밸류체인 (Price Return) 지수
Provider
우리자산운용
Expense ratio
0.31%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 308.9B
Inception
2024-01-16
1-month return
-10.75%
1-year return
+147.04%
Dividend yield
0%
Holdings
10
52-week range
16,325–61,800
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a Korea-listed ETF from 우리자산운용. It tracks the FnGuide 반도체 밸류체인 (Price Return) 지수. Key facts — expense ratio 0.31%; net assets about KRW 308.9B; inception 2024-01-16. Its 1-year return is +147.04%.

Index tracked
FnGuide 반도체 밸류체인 (Price Return) 지수
Provider
우리자산운용
Expense ratio
0.31%
Net assets (AUM)
KRW 308.9B
Inception
2024-01-16
1-month return
-10.75%
1-year return
+147.04%
Dividend yield
0%
Holdings
10
52-week range
16,325–61,800

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 81.87%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

10 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 81.87%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−4.5K sh
Foreign
+2.5K sh
Institution
+2.3K sh
Retail
0.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-0.43%−4.5K sh+2.5K sh+2.3K sh
10/16+4.72%−581 sh−962 sh+1.5K sh
10/15-11.64%+8.4K sh−3.2K sh−6.1K sh
10/14-3.75%+218 sh−3.1K sh+2.9K sh
10/13-3.02%+3.2K sh−3.8K sh+843 sh
Investor flows

Investor net buying

Latest-session net buying by foreigners, institutions and retail (positive = net buy, negative = net sell).

−4.5K sh
Foreign
+2.5K sh
Institution
+2.3K sh
Retail
0.17%
Foreign ownership
DateChangeForeignInst.Retail
10/19-0.43%−4.5K sh+2.5K sh+2.3K sh
10/16+4.72%−581 sh−962 sh+1.5K sh
10/15-11.64%+8.4K sh−3.2K sh−6.1K sh
10/14-3.75%+218 sh−3.1K sh+2.9K sh
10/13-3.02%+3.2K sh−3.8K sh+843 sh
—
Holdings not priced
100.0%
Top-10 weight
1756
Concentration HHI (Moderate)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 100.0% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 1756 — Moderate, and the largest sector is Information Technology (100%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,75632

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,756) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 100%0

Information Technology alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.31%/yr77

0.31% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.1% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 308.9B65

Net assets of KRW 308.9B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

55/ 100
CTilted structure
DiversificationHHI 1,75632

Concentration sits in the 1,500–2,500 band (1,756) — moderate.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 100%0

Information Technology alone is 100%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.31%/yr77

0.31% a year is typical. Held ten years, roughly 3.1% goes to fees.

Fund sizeKRW 308.9B65

Net assets of KRW 308.9B — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 10 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 10 holdings, 81.9% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1SK hynix00066028.20%
2Samsung Electronics00593026.35%
3기가비스4207706.95%
4PSK3196606.80%
5브이엠0899706.64%
6PSK Holdings0319806.17%
7SK Square4023405.34%
8대덕전자3532004.69%
9TES0956104.46%
10Samsung Electro-Mechanics0091504.40%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology100.0%
Industry breakdown
반도체와반도체장비90.9%
전자장비와기기9.1%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 1,756moderate
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) sits at 1756 — moderate. The top 10 names carry 100.0% of equity weight, so the fund is spread out but its largest holdings still steer it.

That is the usual shape of a cap-weighted index fund: broad, yet tilted toward the biggest companies.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Information Technology alone is 100% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 69% of its holdings with 487750 (5 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

Equities are 81.9% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.31% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

474590 comments

Leave a one-line take on WON 반도체밸류체인액티브. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.