--:-- ET
ETF analysis

JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (BBCB) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexBloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade Index
Annual fee0.04%
Net assets$54M
InceptionDec 12, 2018

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from JPMorgan Chase. It tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.04%; net assets about $54M; inception Dec 12, 2018. Its 1-year return is -2.46%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade Index
Provider
JPMorgan Chase
Expense ratio
0.04%
Net assets (AUM)
$54M
Inception
Dec 12, 2018
1-year return
-2.46%
Holdings
1,379
52-week range
$42.64–$46.725
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from JPMorgan Chase. It tracks the Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.04%; net assets about $54M; inception Dec 12, 2018. Its 1-year return is -2.46%.

Index tracked
Bloomberg US Corporate Investment Grade Index
Provider
JPMorgan Chase
Expense ratio
0.04%
Net assets (AUM)
$54M
Inception
Dec 12, 2018
1-year return
-2.46%
Holdings
1,379
52-week range
$42.64–$46.725

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

BBCB comments

Leave a one-line take on JPMorgan BetaBuilders USD Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.