--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF (PFIG) profile & fees

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-16
IndexRAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index
Annual fee0.22%
Net assets$128M
InceptionSep 15, 2011

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.22%; net assets about $128M; inception Sep 15, 2011. Its 1-year return is -0.55%.

Index tracked
RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.22%
Net assets (AUM)
$128M
Inception
Sep 15, 2011
1-year return
-0.55%
Holdings
816
52-week range
$22.93–$25.835
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.22%; net assets about $128M; inception Sep 15, 2011. Its 1-year return is -0.55%.

Index tracked
RAFI Bonds US Investment Grade 1-10 Index
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.22%
Net assets (AUM)
$128M
Inception
Sep 15, 2011
1-year return
-0.55%
Holdings
816
52-week range
$22.93–$25.835

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

0 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 0.00%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Holdings for this ETF haven't been collected yet. The auto-harvester will fill this page in shortly — meanwhile, explore other ETFs below.

PFIG comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco Fundamental Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.