--:-- ET
ETF analysis

iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF (ISCG) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexMorningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index
Annual fee0.06%
Net assets$952M
InceptionJun 28, 2004

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.06%; net assets about $952M; inception Jun 28, 2004. Its 1-year return is +10.35%.

Index tracked
Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.06%
Net assets (AUM)
$952M
Inception
Jun 28, 2004
1-year return
+10.35%
Holdings
923
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from BlackRock. It tracks the Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.06%; net assets about $952M; inception Jun 28, 2004. Its 1-year return is +10.35%.

Index tracked
Morningstar US Small Cap Broad Growth Extended Index
Provider
BlackRock
Expense ratio
0.06%
Net assets (AUM)
$952M
Inception
Jun 28, 2004
1-year return
+10.35%
Holdings
923

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 13.46%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 13.46%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
51.4%
Top-10 weight
449
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 51.4% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 449 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (43%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

83/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 44984

Concentration is below 1,500 (449), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 43%70

Information Technology is 43%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.06%/yr99

At 0.06% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$952M49

Net assets of $952M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

83/ 100
ASimple & diversified
DiversificationHHI 44984

Concentration is below 1,500 (449), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 43%70

Information Technology is 43%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.06%/yr99

At 0.06% a year this is a low-cost fund — little drag over a long hold.

Fund size$952M49

Net assets of $952M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 13.5% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1AtlassianTEAM8.40%
2OktaOKTA8.02%
3Guardant HealthGH5.13%
4RokuROKU5.13%
5NutanixNTNX4.53%
6DynatraceDT4.53%
7RubrikRBRK4.31%
8NordsonNDSN4.09%
9Unity SoftwareU3.64%
10Lincoln ElectricLECO3.64%
11Ralph LaurenRL3.64%
12MedpaceMEDP3.57%
13Guidewire SoftwareGWRE3.49%
14Neurocrine BiosciencesNBIX3.49%
15Tradeweb MarketsTW3.34%
16Manhattan AssociatesMANH3.34%
17Sterling InfrastructureSTRL3.27%
18SamsaraIOT3.27%
19SemtechSMTC3.19%
20Applied Industrial TechnologiesAIT3.12%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology43.1%
Health Care15.3%
Industrials14.6%
Consumer Discretionary11.8%
Communication Services8.8%
Financials3.3%
Consumer Staples3.0%
Industry breakdown
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software40.3%
Industrial Machinery/Components7.7%
Medical Specialities5.1%
Cable & Other Pay Television Services5.1%
Garments and Clothing3.6%
Biotechnology: Commercial Physical & Biological Resarch3.6%
Biotechnology: Biological Products (No Diagnostic Substances)3.5%
Investment Bankers/Brokers/Service3.3%
Military/Government/Technical3.3%
EDP Services3.3%
Semiconductors3.2%
Industrial Specialties3.1%
Medical/Dental Instruments3.1%
Beverages (Production/Distribution)3.0%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores3.0%
Metal Fabrications2.9%
Restaurants2.8%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 449well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 449, with the top 10 holdings at just 51.4% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Information Technology(43%) · Health Care(15%) · Industrials(15%). At 43%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, DUSG, overlaps only 21% (7 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 923 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 13.5% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.06% a year. Funds tracking the same index tend to perform alike, which makes the fee one of the few things that reliably separates them over time.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

ISCG comments

Leave a one-line take on iShares Morningstar Small-Cap Growth ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.