--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF (PEJ) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listed
IndexDynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX)
Annual fee0.58%
Net assets$352M
InceptionJun 23, 2005

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX). Key facts — expense ratio 0.58%; net assets about $352M; inception Jun 23, 2005. Its 1-year return is +12.78%.

Index tracked
Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX)
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.58%
Net assets (AUM)
$352M
Inception
Jun 23, 2005
1-year return
+12.78%
Holdings
33
52-week range
$55.66–$69.425
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Invesco. It tracks the Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX). Key facts — expense ratio 0.58%; net assets about $352M; inception Jun 23, 2005. Its 1-year return is +12.78%.

Index tracked
Dynamic Leisure & Entertainment Int Index (AMEX)
Provider
Invesco
Expense ratio
0.58%
Net assets (AUM)
$352M
Inception
Jun 23, 2005
1-year return
+12.78%
Holdings
33
52-week range
$55.66–$69.425

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 87.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 87.72%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
52.5%
Top-10 weight
433
Concentration HHI (Low)
Consumer Discretionary
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 52.5% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 433 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Consumer Discretionary (82%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

60/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 43386

Concentration is below 1,500 (433), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 82%4

Consumer Discretionary alone is 82%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.58%/yr54

0.58% a year is on the high side — about 5.8% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$352M33

Net assets of $352M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

60/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 43386

Concentration is below 1,500 (433), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceConsumer Discretionary 82%4

Consumer Discretionary alone is 82%. This is effectively a bet on that one industry — if the sector falls, diversification will not help.

Cost0.58%/yr54

0.58% a year is on the high side — about 5.8% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$352M33

Net assets of $352M — liquid enough to trade, and unlikely to be wound down.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 87.7% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1Marriott InternationalMAR6.52%
2SyscoSYY5.92%
3StarbucksSBUX5.54%
4Live Nation EntertainmentLYV5.48%
5AirbnbABNB5.48%
6VikingVIK5.44%
7Delta Air LinesDAL5.41%
8ExpediaEXPE5.14%
9Cracker Barrel Old Country StoreCBRL3.89%
10Pursuit Attractions and HospitalityPRSU3.68%
11AMC EntertainmentAMC3.60%
12CinemarkCNK3.37%
13The Cheesecake FactoryCAKE3.33%
14Choice Hotels InternationalCHH3.23%
15Arcos DoradosARCO3.20%
16Madison Square Garden SportsMSGS3.19%
17MaplebearCART3.17%
18Madison Square Garden EntertainmentMSGE3.16%
19Marriott Vacations WorldwideVAC3.11%
20US FoodsUSFD3.07%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Consumer Discretionary82.5%
Consumer Staples5.9%
Communication Services5.5%
Financials3.1%
Information Technology3.0%
Industry breakdown
Restaurants22.0%
Services-Misc. Amusement & Recreation18.5%
Hotels/Resorts12.7%
Food Distributors9.0%
Movies/Entertainment7.0%
Diversified Commercial Services5.5%
Marine Transportation5.4%
Air Freight/Delivery Services5.4%
Transportation Services5.1%
Business Services3.2%
Real Estate3.1%
Computer Software: Programming Data Processing3.0%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 433well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 433, with the top 10 holdings at just 52.5% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

By sector, Consumer Discretionary alone is 82% — whatever the fund is called, this is a bet on that industry.

Bad news for the sector moves the whole fund. Worth checking against anything else you hold in the same space.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

Even its closest peer, AWAY, overlaps only 12% (3 shared names).

Funds filed under the same label can hold quite different companies, so pairing this one with another may genuinely spread risk.

What it is made of

The fund holds 33 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 87.7% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.58% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

PEJ comments

Leave a one-line take on Invesco Leisure and Entertainment ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.