--:-- ET
ETF analysis

Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF (WOMN) holdings & weights

Per-holding contribution · concentration · sector skew — a deep read

US-listedAs of 2026-10-12
IndexMorningstar Women's Empowerment Index
Annual fee0.75%
Net assets$59M
InceptionAug 24, 2018

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Impact Shares. It tracks the Morningstar Women's Empowerment Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.75%; net assets about $59M; inception Aug 24, 2018. Its 1-year return is +12.95%.

Index tracked
Morningstar Women's Empowerment Index
Provider
Impact Shares
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets (AUM)
$59M
Inception
Aug 24, 2018
1-year return
+12.95%
Holdings
203
52-week range
$38.63–$45.87
Fund details

Fund overview

This is a US-listed ETF from Impact Shares. It tracks the Morningstar Women's Empowerment Index. Key facts — expense ratio 0.75%; net assets about $59M; inception Aug 24, 2018. Its 1-year return is +12.95%.

Index tracked
Morningstar Women's Empowerment Index
Provider
Impact Shares
Expense ratio
0.75%
Net assets (AUM)
$59M
Inception
Aug 24, 2018
1-year return
+12.95%
Holdings
203
52-week range
$38.63–$45.87

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 54.12%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

Weight and calculation basis

25 identified stocks · net exposure / NAV 54.12%. Display weights are normalized to 100%; calculations retain original exposures without an additional leverage multiplier. Cash and unallocated contracts are excluded from stock attribution.

—
Holdings not priced
61.9%
Top-10 weight
535
Concentration HHI (Low)
Information Technology
Top sector

We have this ETF's holdings, but the prices for those particular listings are outside our quote coverage (currently Korea- and US-listed securities). So today's contribution and return are not computed — showing 0% would claim it did not move, which is a different statement. The holdings and weights below follow the calculation basis above.

Today's summary

Its top 10 holdings make up about 61.9% of the fund. The concentration index (HHI) is 535 — Low — evenly diversified, and the largest sector is Information Technology (43%). The higher the concentration, the more one stock or sector drives the whole ETF's return.

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

63/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 53578

Concentration is below 1,500 (535), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 43%70

Information Technology is 43%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.75%/yr39

0.75% a year is on the high side — about 7.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$59M3

Net assets of $59M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Concentration and diversification

Structural health

A five-axis read on how this fund is built. It is not a return forecast or a recommendation, and a low score does not mean a bad fund — leveraged products score low by design. Each axis shows the figure behind it.

63/ 100
BSound structure
DiversificationHHI 53578

Concentration is below 1,500 (535), so no single holding dominates.

Sector balanceInformation Technology 43%70

Information Technology is 43%, a clear tilt. That industry's swings will drive the fund.

Cost0.75%/yr39

0.75% a year is on the high side — about 7.5% over a decade, so it needs a reason to earn that.

Fund size$59M3

Net assets of $59M are small. Thin funds trade at wider spreads, and very small ones get closed or merged.

Structural simplicityPhysical, 1x100

A plain 1x physical fund holding the shares themselves — no structural drift from how long you hold it.

Top 20 holdings

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Normalized to 100% of analysed positions

Weights are normalized to 100% of absolute exposures across analysed positions, including positions outside this top list. Cash, collateral and unverified assets are excluded. Contributions retain original signed NAV exposures; leverage is not applied twice.

Tile size = weight, colour = the day's return (deeper = larger). Covers the top 25 holdings, 54.1% of the fund. Labels are dropped where a tile is too small; hover any tile for its name and figures.
#HoldingWeight
1MicrosoftMSFT10.05%
2AlphabetGOOGL9.57%
3NVIDIANVDA8.02%
4Cisco SystemsCSCO7.22%
5JPMorgan ChaseJPM6.12%
6ExxonMobilXOM4.95%
7VisaV4.66%
8Texas InstrumentsTXN4.08%
9Verizon CommunicationsVZ3.83%
10AbbVieABBV3.44%
11International Business MachinesIBM3.36%
12Analog DevicesADI3.12%
13WalmartWMT2.92%
14SalesforceCRM2.90%
15ChevronCVX2.75%
16The Coca-ColaKO2.46%
17MerckMRK2.44%
18The Procter & GamblePG2.42%
19Bank of AmericaBAC2.42%
20ServiceNowNOW2.38%

Holdings below 0.5% or outside the top list are folded into “Others” and omitted above.

Where the weight sits — sector mix

Listed equity weights summed by sector and normalized to 100%. Each band is one sector's share.

Information Technology43.3%
Communication Services13.4%
Financials13.2%
Health Care8.2%
Consumer Staples7.8%
Energy7.7%
Consumer Discretionary4.3%
Industrials2.2%
Industry breakdown
Computer Software: Prepackaged Software15.3%
Semiconductors15.2%
Computer Software: Programming Data Processing9.6%
Business Services9.0%
Major Banks8.5%
Integrated oil Companies7.7%
Computer Communications Equipment7.2%
Biotechnology: Pharmaceutical Preparations5.9%
Telecommunications Equipment3.8%
Computer Manufacturing3.4%
Department/Specialty Retail Stores2.9%
Beverages (Production/Distribution)2.5%
Package Goods/Cosmetics2.4%
Medical Specialities2.3%
Consumer Electronics/Appliances2.2%
RETAIL: Building Materials2.0%
Concentration at a glanceHHI 535well spread
spread1,0001,8002,500concentrated

HHI sums the squared weights. The more it leans on a few names, the higher it goes — and the more the whole ETF moves with them.

How concentrated is it

Concentration (HHI) is low at 535, with the top 10 holdings at just 61.9% of equity weight. No single name can dominate the fund.

Good for damping single-stock risk — and equally, a big winner inside gets diluted.

HHI squares each weight and sums them: 10,000 means one stock is everything, and the more evenly spread the holdings, the closer it falls to zero.

Where the sector weight sits

Sector weights run Information Technology(43%) · Communication Services(13%) · Financials(13%). At 43%, the leading sector is a clear tilt.

Expect it to ride that industry's cycle — ahead of the index in good stretches, behind in bad ones.

Weights above sum the individually listed equities and normalize that equity total to 100%.

How much it overlaps others

It shares 52% of its holdings with DLN (15 names in common) — close to half the same companies.

Own both and the diversification is thinner than it looks.

What it is made of

The fund holds 203 positions in total; this page lists the largest 25 and folds the rest into "Others".

Equities are 54.1% of the fund, the rest swaps and cash — index exposure built synthetically rather than by owning the shares, which adds counterparty risk.

The expense ratio is 0.75% a year, which is not cheap. Fees come out of returns every year you hold, so it is worth checking whether the same index is available for less.

This page is not investment advice. Investment decisions and responsibility are your own.

WOMN comments

Leave a one-line take on Impact Shares Women's Empowerment ETF. No account — just a nickname and a code to delete it later.

Loading…

Similar ETFs

Picked by how much their actual holdings overlap. The higher the overlap, the less diversification you get from owning both.